Addition of section 18-b HMA 1955

Umesh Pandurang Jadhav (Querist) 22 April 2018 This query is : Resolved
Ronika and manish married on 10-10-15, husband & wife running their case in family court .

In beginning Manish filled petition for divorce from Ronika...

Even Ronika gave replied to Manish's notice and submitted W.S on 10-3-17 in family court..

After wards Ronika declared under oath on affidavit regarding marital status as UNMARRIED in election ...on 20-10-16.
In addition Ronika declare that she is wife of her father in general affidavit which was additional attachment to other election affidavits .

Manish received her election affidavit of unmarried via RTI and submitted to family court judge ..

Manish filled private case under section IPC 420 & 406 in criminal court on 12-8-17. Even criminal court judge issued notice to Ronika under IPC 420 & 406.

My question

Possible for Manish to add section 18-b of HMA 1955 to family court or criminal court as amendment on today's date ??

Crpc 468 (time bar ) applicable to section 18-b of HMA 1955.

Section 18 of HMA 1955 (prohibition of women to marry with father )
As in her general affidavit she told "she is wife of her father "

Follow Query

Report Abuse

P. Venu (Expert) 23 April 2018
Is this query or a riddle?

Umesh Pandurang Jadhav (Querist) 23 April 2018
It's a query

Ms.Usha Kapoor (Expert) 23 April 2018
People's Representatives in their election/ general affidavits are stating truths or lies is unbelievable. Politician s or common man
s leaders who stand for MLA and MP posts become Ministers should be illustrious and set example to t people they represent by following ethics and principles.Ronika in election affidavit t during elections stated she is unmarried having already married to Manish and in the same vein in general affidavit stated she is the wife of her father satisfying section 18(b) Of HMA 1955 prohibited relationship under Hindu law which is illegal, immoral and opposed to pubic policy. shows how politicians stoop to such low levels.Such immoral persons are unfit to lead people and only ethical with statesmen like qualities must be elected. Such people like Ronika should be put behind the bars and their property confiscated.Manish made a complaint under 420and 406 IPC in FIR. The Magistrate also issued her notice u/ss420 and 406.Both 18(b) civil and criminal prosecution can be launched against Ronika. simultaneously.