This document contains the original judgement from the High Court of Delhi in the case of Praveen Garg versus The High Court of Delhi & Ors. The judgement addresses the petitioner's challenge to Rule 9(2) of the Delhi Higher Judiciary Services Rules, 1970, concerning the eligibility criteria for judicial appointments, specifically the requirement of continuous practice as an advocate. It delves into the interpretation of Article 233(2) of the Constitution of India regarding the seven-year practice requirement. This judgement is of interest to legal professionals, aspiring judicial officers, and anyone involved in understanding the nuances of judicial recruitment in India.
Download
Preview
