Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Dr. S.P. Thirumala Rao Vs. Municipal Commissioner Mysore City Municipal Corporation Dr. S.P. Thirum


  Download  


Description:
The applicant had paid a fee of Rs.10/- for seeking the said information. The case of the applicant would fall within the scope and ambit of Section 2(i)(o) of CP Act, which provides that service means service of any description which is made available to potential users, which include purveying of news or supplying of other information. The complainant had availed of the services under the said Act for consideration by paying fee and had sought information under the said Act, which was not supplied to him, which amounts to deficiency of service. The complainant is, thus, a consumer vis-à-vis information sought on payment under the said Act. In our view, therefore, the State Commission was wrong while holding that once the complainant had availed the remedy against which appeal was provided, he could not maintain a complaint under the CP Act. #doc

Submitted By:
  on 24 February 2012
Scorecard : 215 My Other Files

Downloaded:
110 times

File size:
41 KB

Rating:

Download Other files in Corporate Law category