The Hon’ble SC has observed, in the case of State of Rajasthan vs. Ashok Khatoliya that the Constitution (Seventy-Fourth Amendment) Act, 1992 does not take away the State’s power to legislate in matters pertaining to local government. In ..
Rajiv Gandhi Assasination Convict Perarivalan Released After 32 Years: Strong Opposition From Centre In a very significant development, in the case of AG Perarivalan vs State of Tamil Nadu the Hon’ble SC has granted bail to the Rajiv Gandhi ass ..
In Mohisin Salimbhai Quereshi V. State Of Gujrat, 2022, under the Central Goods and Services Act of 2017, Justice Gita Gopi granted bail to an accused after observing that in deciding bail applications, the Court should undoubtedly take the delay in ..
In Kalla @ Vidyaram Vs. State of MP (2022), Justice Anand Pathak overruled the Madhya Pradesh High Court's imposed condition for obtaining bail, which required a Bail Applicant to plant five seedlings of any 'fruit yielding tree' or ' ..
In a very significant development, in the case of AG Perarivalan vs State of Tamil Nadu the Hon’ble SC has granted bail to the Rajiv Gandhi assasination case convict Perarivalan, who has moved the Apex Court seeking a remission of his sentence ..
Justices Vikram D. Chauhan and Anjani Kumar Mishra, in the case of Ram Harsh v. Union of India and 4 Others (2021), ruled that the Armed Forces Tribunal Act cannot limit the powers granted by the constitution. The authority granted by Article 226 of ..
Order 21 Rule 34 CPC Cannot Be Done Away With: Executing Court Has To Invite Objections From Judgement Debtor: SC The Hon’ble SC, in Rajbir vs. Suraj Bhan has observed that the Court, under Order 21 Rule 34 is duty-bound to invite objections fr ..
In Ajay Kumar v. the State of Punjab And Others, Justice Sandeep Sharma ruled that the petitioner's offenses were relatively trivial, including neither moral depravity nor a heinous crime. Thus, the Court deemed it reasonable to quash the FIR an ..
The Hon’ble SC, in Rajbir vs. Suraj Bhan has observed that the Court, under Order 21 Rule 34 is duty-bound to invite objections from the judgement-debtor to the draft deed which has been submitted by the decree holder. It is pertinent to note ..
Justices Indira Banerjee and JK Maheshwari, in F. Liansanga vs. Union of India (2018), have observed that the power of the courts to condone delay as provided in Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 does not extend to suits. While upholding the jud ..
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
