Denial Of Sex ‘Cruelty’ But Not ‘Exceptional Hardship’ For The Purpose Of Section 14 Of HMA: Cooling Priod Cannot Be Waived: Delhi HC In the case of Rishu Aggarwal vs Mohit Goyal the Delhi HC has held that the denial of conjug ..
In the case of KC Laxmana vs KC Chandrappa Gowda the Apex Court has held that a Hindu Father or any other member of Hindu Undivided Family has power to make a gift of ancestral property only for a pious purpose and the same cannot be done out of lov ..
In Muhammed Hasheer Poolakkal v. United Arab Bank & Anr. (2022), Justice Ziyad Rahman AA observed, while evaluating the legislative intent behind implementing Chapter VIIA of the CrPC, that allowing any individual or institution to file an appli ..
In the case of Kailash Chandra Panda and ors. vs. State of Orissa and ors. the Orissa HC has held that a revision petition under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) is not maintainable before the HC against the order of the District Cou ..
In the case of Rishu Aggarwal vs Mohit Goyal the Delhi HC has held that the denial of conjugal relationship does not amount to ‘exceptional hardship’ or ‘exceptional depravity’ and thus, cannot be a ground for waving of the m ..
In Dr. Papia Mukherjee v. Aruna Banerjee and Others, Chief Justice Prakash Srivastava (in a single-judge bench) held that the death of a party does not discharge an arbitration agreement. The agreement remains enforceable by/against the legal repres ..
Report After Investigation u/s 173(8) CrPC Must Be Placed Before Magistrate: Chhattisgarh HC In the case of Mirza Dawood Baig vs State of Chattisgarh and ors, the Chhattisgarh HC has held that in cases where any further investigation has been carried ..
In the case of Besahu Lal Yadav vs State of Chhattisgarh the Chhattisgarh HC has held that when a witness is examined by the Court under section 165 of the Indian Evidence Act, he/she is required to be cross-examined to elicit further truth or other ..
In the case of Mirza Dawood Baig vs State of Chattisgarh and ors, the Chhattisgarh HC has held that in cases where any further investigation has been carried out under Section 173(8), then irrespective of its outcome, the report of such further inve ..
Hindu Adoption And Maintenance Act; Proviso To Section 6 Does Not Render Fathers’s Custody Of Child Below 5 Years Illegal: Patna HC The Hon’ble Patna HC, in GGSS Sitara vs The State of Bihar and ors. has held that the proviso to section 6 ..
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
