Background of the Case The case title is "Delhi Airport Metro Express Pvt. Ltd. vs Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd (CA 5627 of 2021)". The appeal was heard by the Supreme Court on 9th September 2021. The Supreme Court Bench that heard the ..
CASE TITLESadique vs. State of Madhya Pradesh; CrA 963 OF 2021KEY TAKEAWAYS This case was heard by the bench of Justices Uday Umesh Lalit, S. Ravindra Bhat, and Belam M Trivedi. The counsels for this case were Sr. Adv Siddhartha Dave for the accused, ..
Name of the CaseK.N. Nagarajappa v. H. Narasimha ReddyKey Takeaways A High Court’s judgment allowing second appeal was challenged on the ground of it being out of jurisdiction of the Court. The Supreme Court observed that when the lower Court w ..
In A Democratic Setup, The Will Of The Majority Has To PrevailThe case was of Sangeeta w/o Sunil Shinde v. The State of Maharasthra&Ors.The decision was given by Justice L Naheswara Rao and Justice B R Gavai. The appeal was dismissed and the High ..
Background The petitioners had filed a claim against the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA). According to the petition, various insurance companies had collected premium amounts from a large number of Indian citizens, and there wer ..
NAME OF THE CASE AND CORAM Northern Western Railway and Another v. Sanjay Shukla Coram: Justices MR Shah and Aniruddha Bose Citation: LL 2021 SC 427KEY TAKEAWAYS The Supreme Court ruled that every customer’s time was important and valuable If t ..
Name of the CaseJitendra Singh v. State of Madhya PradeshKey Takeaways The Additional Commissioner of Rewa had passed order on the basis of a will produced by the petitioner which was set aside by the MP High Court. The Court placed reliance on sever ..
KEY TAKEAWAYS This case was heard by the bench of Justice Surya Prakash Kesarwani and Justice Piyush Agrawal According to the facts of the case, the court applied the principle of prima facie in this case. The petitioner abused the process of law by ..
Magistrates Cannot Extend Time To Complete Investigation In UAPA CasesThe case was of Sadique v. State of Madhya Pradesh. The decision was given by Justices Uday Umesh Lalit, S. Ravindra Bhat and Belam M Trivedi. Sr. Advocate Siddhartha Dave appeared ..
CASE NAME AND CORAM Employers In Relation To The Management Of Bhalgora Area Of M/S Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. Appellant(S) Versus Workmen Being Represented By Janta Mazdoor Sangh Citation: LL 2021 SC 424 Coram: Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hrishikes ..
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
