Father Cannot File Habeas Corpus To Get The Child’s Custody From Mother: Karnataka HC In the case of Gaurav Raj Jain vs. State of Karnataka, the Karnataka HC has, by its order dated 4th January, 2022, held that a father cannot file a writ petit ..
The Hon’ble SC has once again reiterated in Employees State Insurance Corporation vs. Union of India that both the client and the Court are not bound by a lawyer’s admission as to matters of law or legal conclusions. In the instant case, ..
In the case of Gaurav Raj Jain vs. State of Karnataka, the Karnataka HC has, by its order dated 4th January, 2022, held that a father cannot file a writ petition to secure the custody of his minor child. The Court has imposed a fine of Rs.50,000 on ..
In the case of Jose Samuel vs. M/s Royal International Trade and Allied Products Pvt. Ltd. has rejected an application for the initiation of a CIRP (Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process) against the defendant- Royal International Trade and Allied ..
The Hon’ble Allahabad HC, in the case of Satyaprakash vs. State of UP and ors. has held that while exercising the powers vested in the Court under Section 156(3) of CrPC, the Court can also monitor the ongoing investigation. In a plea before t ..
In a case titled Special Police Establishment vs. Umesh Tiwari and anr. the Madhya Pradesh HC has held that while the victim and the Courts can invoke section 91 of CrPC at any stage of the legal proceedings, be it investigation, inquiry or trial, t ..
Stage At Which Section 91 Can Be Invoked: Read What Madhya Pradesh HC Has To Say In a case titled Special Police Establishment vs. Umesh Tiwari and anr. the Madhya Pradesh HC has held that while the victim and the Courts can invoke section 91 of CrPC ..
Plea Taken By Defendant In WS Irrelevant While Considering An Application Under Order 7, Rule 11: Madhya Pradesh HC In the case of Foti Rakabchand Jain through LRs vs Foti Ratanlala Jain through LRs the Madhya Pradesh HC has held that the rejection o ..
In the recent landmark case of Neil Aurelio Nunes and ors. vs. Union of India and ors. the Hon’ble SC, while upholding the validity of the 27% reservation of OBC in NEET-AIQ, stated that Article 15(4) and 15(5) are not an exception but an exte ..
The Punjab and Haryana HC, in a case titled Sukhchain Singh @ Chaini vs. State of Punjab has held that the rejection of a regular bail plea under 439 CrPC by considering it as an anticipatory bail plea under section 439 CrPC was a cause for grave co ..
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
