The Orissa HC has, in the case of Surendra Kumar Sahoo vs State of Odisha, held that the Tata Power Company Limited (TPCL), though not a State within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution, is nevertheless an authority within the meaning of A ..
The Hon’ble Kerala HC has described the scope and ambit of cruelty while granting a decree of divorce in the case of Mary Margret vs Jos P Thomas and has held that not taking treatment for mental issues in order to bring peace to the family ho ..
The Rajasthan HC, in Parul Khurrana vs. The High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan & anr. has held that there is nothing in law that allows for a woman, not yet divorced, to seek reservation under the ‘Divorcee Female’ category. In t ..
In a case titled Ramesh vs State Through Dy RFO the Karnataka HC has said that once an accused appears before the Court either personally or through his pleader, he cannot seek an anticipatory bail under section 438 of CrPC. In the instant case the ..
Order VIII Rule 1: Delayed Filing Of Documents By Defendants Not Permissible Without Court’s Leave: Delhi HC The Delhi HC has reiterated in Jindal Stainless (Hisar) Ltd. vs. Sourabh Jinal and ors. that order VIII rule 1A(3) clearly stipulates t ..
The Delhi HC has reiterated in Jindal Stainless (Hisar) Ltd. vs. Sourabh Jinal and ors. that order VIII rule 1A(3) clearly stipulates that the documents which should have been produced before the Court but have not been so produced, shall not be pro ..
Section 372 CrPC: Right Of Appeal Of Victim Absolute; Special Leave Not Necessary: SC The Hon’ble SC, in the case of Joseph Stephen vs Santhanasamy has held that the right of appeal that has been provided to the accused under section 372 of CrP ..
In Rajendrabhai Maganbhai Koli vs Shantaben Maganbhai Koli the Hon’ble Gujarat HC has held that the time limit for the filing of the written statement that is provided under Order VIII Rule 1 is directory and not mandatory. But the Court also ..
The Hon’ble SC, in the case of State of Punjab vs. Anshika Goyal has observed that providing a reservation to a class of persons, and the percentage decided from the same is a policy decision, and the HC cannot, under Article 226, issue a writ ..
The Hon’ble SC, in the case of Joseph Stephen vs Santhanasamy has held that the right of appeal that has been provided to the accused under section 372 of CrPC is an absolute right and no special leave is necessary in this case, as is needed i ..
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
