Setting aside an impugned order of the Patna High Court, the Hon’ble Supreme Court (“the Court”), in the case of KahkashanKausar @ Sonam v State of Bihar, held that general and omnibus allegations cannot manifest in a situation whe ..
In a hearing addressing an order issued by the School Education Board of Karnataka (KEB), banning the hijab across educational institutions in Karnataka, the High Court has appealed the student community of the State and the people at large to maint ..
Grant Of Default Bail On Failure To Take Cognizance Before Expiry Of Statutory Period Incorrect: SC The Hon’ble SC in Serious Fraud Investigation Office vs. Rahul Modi has held that an accused cannot claim the right of statutory bail if the Cou ..
The Hon’ble Apex Court has, in State of Andhra Pradesh vs. A.P. State Wakf Board has held that Article 26 does not interfere with the right of the State to acquire property. Thus, the Apex Court set aside the action of the Andhra Pradesh Wakf ..
The Hon’ble SC in Serious Fraud Investigation Office vs. Rahul Modi has held that an accused cannot claim the right of statutory bail if the Court has not taken cognizance within the period of 60 or 90 days as is provided in section 167 CrPC, ..
Preliminary Inquiry Not Needed When Prosecution Of Witness Is Done Under U/S 195 IPC: Madhya Pradesh HC In the case of Laxman Rao vs. Court of Third Additional Sessions Judge, Guna and anr. the Hon’ble Madhya Pradesh HC has held that an inquiry ..
Setting aside the order passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), the Supreme Court (SC), in the case of Consolidated Construction Consortium Limited v Hitro Energy Solutions Private Limited,held that an operational creditor inc ..
In the case of Laxman Rao vs. Court of Third Additional Sessions Judge, Guna and anr. the Hon’ble Madhya Pradesh HC has held that an inquiry is not an absolute necessity before prosecuting a witness under section 195 CrPC and the applicant doe ..
The Delhi HC in the case of Saleem Khan vs The State (Govt. of NCT Delhi), while upholding the conviction of the accused under section 307 read with section 324 of IPC has held that the testimony of the injured eyewitness is credible even in the fac ..
● Supreme Court Bench, in the case of Indian Oil Corporation Ltd v Shree Ganesh Petroleum Rajgurunagar,has observed that an award will be patently illegal where the Arbitral Tribunal fails to acts on terms of the contract or ignores the specific t ..
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
