NAME OF THE CASE AND CORAM Case: Ramgopal vs. State of Madhya Pradesh Coram: CJI NV Ramana and Justice Surya Kant Case No: CrA 1489 of 2012KEY-TAKEAWAYS There is discretionary power of the court to dismiss non compoundable cases under Section 482 CrP ..
NAME OF THE CASE AND CORAM Case Name: P Lathavya Acharya And State Of Karnataka Case Citation: WP 8926/2021KEY TAKEAWAYS No violation of Fundamental rights by practicing Bala-sanyasa. The selection of Shiroor Mutt's Peedathipathi is in keeping wi ..
KEY TAKEAWAYS “Appointments to public posts should be strictly in accordance with Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India", the Court said. The eligibility standards must be uniform without giving any scope of arbitrary selections. ..
Provision For Upper Age Limit Is Mandatory & Can't Be RelaxedThe case was of the State of Jammu and Kashmir v. Shaheena Masarat and Anr. The decision was given by Justices L Nageswara Rao and Sanjiv Khanna. The Court held that there could not ..
NAME OF THE CASE AND CORAM NAME: Khatema Fibres Ltd. vs. New India Assurance Company Ltd. CORAM: Justices Hemant Gupta and V. Rama Subramanian CASE NO:CA 9050 OF 2018KEY TAKEAWAYS The Surveyors' Report is not totally sacrosanct. Consumer Forums, ..
KEY TAKEAWAY The Karnataka High Court quashed the previous State Government order dated 19 March 2018, allowing only Muslim priest (Mujawar) to perform rituals. It was said that it is violative of Article 25 of the Constitution of India which states ..
NAME OF THE CASE AND CORAM Case Name:Humanity, Salt Lake & Anr v. State of West Bengal Coram: Chief Justice (Acting) The Hon’ble Justice Arijit Banerjee, Justice Rajesh Bindal Citation: WPA 579 of 2016KEY TAKEAWAYS The Hon’ble Court i ..
Key Takeaways The verdict “Retrospective seniority cannot be claimed from date when the employee is not even borne in service” was identified by the Apex Court against an appeal filed by the Bihar Government asserting the decision of the ..
Insurance Surveyor's Report Not Sancrosanct, But Consumer Forum Cannot Subject It To Forensic ExaminationThe case was of Khatema Fibres Ltd. v. New India Assurance Company Ltd.The decision was given by Justices Hemant Gupta and V. Ramasubramanian ..
NAME OF THE CASE AND CORAM NAME: Shantharam Prabhu and Mr. K. Dayanand Rai CORAM: Justice Suraj Govindaraj CASE NO: Crp No.96 Of 2021KEY TAKEAWAYS Once an apartment is subject to the Karnataka Apartment Ownership Act, the Karnataka Ownership Flats Ac ..
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
