In Samantha Christina Delfina Willis & Anr v State Of Karnataka and Ors, the Karnataka High Court held that a POA (power of attorney) holder of an accused cannot maintain a petition either under Article 226 or 227 of the Constitution of India r/ ..
In Anzar v. Sreedeviyamma & Anr, the Kerala High Court held that an amendment application inconsistent with that of the original written statement may be submitted without withdrawing wilful admission mentioned in the statement. Moreover, such a ..
In Shyam Sunder Prasad v. Central Bureau Of Investigation Lucknow, the Allahabad High Court held that the trial Court is empowered to permit the prosecution to produce certificates u/s 65-B (4) of the Indian Evidence Act at a later point during the ..
In Dushyant Kumar v. Central Bureau of Investigation, the Delhi High Court has noted that the question whether the evidence should be included or excluded from consideration while giving the final verdict must be taken at the end and not during the ..
In Anurag S/o. Padmesh Gupta vs Bank of India, the Bombay High Court held that the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) does not have authority to restrain a citizen from travelling abroad as there is no provision under the Recovery of Debts Due To Banks an ..
In Anzar v. Sreedeviyamma & Anr, the Kerala High Court held that an amendment application inconsistent with that of the original written statement may be submitted without withdrawing wilful admission mentioned in the statement. Moreover, such a ..
The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has recently opposed the applications filed by the imprisoned former Maharashtra Home Minister, Anil Deshmukh, and the state Cabinet Minister, Nawab Mailk seeking bail for one day to cast their votes in the upcoming ..
In Re : TN Godavarman Thirumalpad versus Union of India, the Supreme Court observed that the famous Public Trust Doctrine is a part of the law of land. The Court further said that the State has a duty to act as a trustee for the advantage of the gen ..
In Capitol Art House (P) Ltd. v. Neha Datta, the Delhi High Court held that the re-examination opportunity cannot be used as a chance to undo its prior statement made during cross-examination and fabricate the evidence. In this case, the Court was ..
In Neelofar Rasool v. Imtiyaz Ahmad Ahangar & Ors, the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh held that the duty of Protection Officer in Domestic Violence Cases does not involve undertaking either mediation or conciliation. The Hon'ble ..
Member Strength 9,52,012 and growing..
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
