Setting aside the order of a single bench judge of the Delhi High Court (HC), Supreme Court (SC), in the case of Future Retail Ltd v Amazon.com Investment Holdings & Future Coupons Pvt Ltd v Amazon.com Investment Holdings observed that a civil c ..
The Hon’ble Punjab and Haryana HC, in the case of Mamta Giri vs. State of UT Chandigarh has held that nothing contained in section 82 CrPC will bar a proclaimed offender to file an application seeking anticipatory bail, if he could satisfy the ..
In the case of State Of Sikkim vs Jasbir Singh the Hon’ble SC has held that a criminal Court will have the jurisdiction to try a case against an army personnel when the Commanding Officer has not exercised his discretion under section 125 of t ..
Section 82 CrPC Does Not Bar Filing Of Anticipatory Bail By Proclaimed Offenders: Punjab and Haryana HC The Hon’ble Punjab and Haryana HC, in the case of Mamta Giri vs. State of UT Chandigarh has held that nothing contained in section 82 CrPC w ..
The Delhi High Court, in the case of Shakiluddin @ Babloo v the State has upheld the order passed by the Trial Court framing the charge of murder and consequently, dismissed the revision petition submitted before it by the petitioner/ revisionist. D ..
In the case of Pappu Tiwary vs State of Jharkhand, the Hon’ble SC has reiterated that the burden to prove the plea of alibi is on the accused and it is a heavy burden. Plea of alibi is provided in section 11 of the Indian Evidence Act where it ..
In the case of Divyajot Singh Jendu vs. Manikaran Analytics Limited has held that a summons to an accused person under section 204 CrPC cannot be issued unless an inquiry under section 202 CrPC is held. In the instant case, the present revision peti ..
Burden of Proof To Establish Alibi Is Heavy: SC In the case of Pappu Tiwary vs State of Jharkhand, the Hon’ble SC has reiterated that the burden to prove the plea of alibi is on the accused and it is a heavy burden. Plea of alibi is provided in ..
In the case of State of MP vs. RD Sharma the Hon’ble SC has held that ‘Equal Pay for Equal Work’ is not a fundamental right vested in any employee, but is certainly a constitutional goal which is to be achieved by the Government. I ..
In the case titled K Ravi Prasad Reddy vs. G Giridhar the Hon’ble Andhra Pradesh HC has held that section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act which incorporates the doctrine of lis pendens does not operate as a bar to the grant of temporary inj ..
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
