Order 21 Rule 34 CPC Cannot Be Done Away With: Executing Court Has To Invite Objections From Judgement Debtor: SC The Hon’ble SC, in Rajbir vs. Suraj Bhan has observed that the Court, under Order 21 Rule 34 is duty-bound to invite objections fr ..
In Ajay Kumar v. the State of Punjab And Others, Justice Sandeep Sharma ruled that the petitioner's offenses were relatively trivial, including neither moral depravity nor a heinous crime. Thus, the Court deemed it reasonable to quash the FIR an ..
The Hon’ble SC, in Rajbir vs. Suraj Bhan has observed that the Court, under Order 21 Rule 34 is duty-bound to invite objections from the judgement-debtor to the draft deed which has been submitted by the decree holder. It is pertinent to note ..
Justices Indira Banerjee and JK Maheshwari, in F. Liansanga vs. Union of India (2018), have observed that the power of the courts to condone delay as provided in Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 does not extend to suits. While upholding the jud ..
Prosecutrix’s Right U/S 33(5) POCSO Vs Right Of The Accused To Recall Witnesses U/S 311 CrPC: Know What The Odisha HC Has To Say The Hon’ble Odisha HC has, in Pidika Sambaru vs State of Orissa and anr has held that the right of the accuse ..
In Madhav Singh v. the State of UP (2021), the Hon'ble Allahabad HC observed that after granting an order under Section 156 (3) CrPC, the Magistrate cannot back out of the matter, and the Magistrate is responsible for ensuring that the inquiry i ..
The Hon’ble Odisha HC has, in Pidika Sambaru vs State of Orissa and anr has held that the right of the accused to recall witnesses under section 311 of CrPC cannot always be denied merely on the ground of the right of the prosecutrix under sec ..
Go, Prepare For Exams! Plea For Cancellation Of Exam Dismissed By SC The Hon’ble SC, in Suraj and ors. vs. Karnataka State University and ors. has refused to interfere with the order of the Karnataka HC wherein it had allowed the Karnataka Stat ..
The Hon'ble Punjab and Haryana HC has, in Ankit And Others v. the State of Haryana, recently made a significant comment, broadening the scope of Section 377 of the IPC, which stated that it would amount to an offense even if the penetration occu ..
The Hon’ble High Court of Rajasthan (HC) in Vinod Sharma v Smt. Shanti Devi & Ors, observed that the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (Sr. Citizens Act)does not envisage an order of eviction neither by the D ..
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
