Learn Trademark Filing Like a Pro. Register Now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Lawyersclubindia News


Nominee Director Not Responsible For Routine Affairs Can’t Be Charged U/S 138 Of Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 : Allahabad HC

   12 March 2022 at 13:29

The Hon’ble High Court, in the case of Jatinder Pal Singh v. M/S Statcon Power Controls Ltd. & Ors has held that a nominee director, not involved in day-to-day affairs of the company, can’t be held liable for any offence committed by ..

Posted in Others |   266 Views


SC/ST Welfare Department And Not Appointing Authority Can De-reserve SC/ST Quota Seats: SC

   12 March 2022 at 11:30

In Mandeep Kumar And Ors. v. UT Chandigarh And Ors., 2022, Justices Indira Banerjee and JK Maheshwari refused to meddle with the ruling of the Punjab and Haryana HC regarding the interchangeability/de-reservation. In this instance, after some applic ..

Posted in Others |   138 Views


Top News Headlines 11th Mar 2022: 74th Constitutional Amendment Does Not Restrict State’s Power To Legislate In Matters Of Local Bodies

   12 March 2022 at 09:48

74th Constitutional Amendment Does Not Restrict State’s Power To Legislate In Matters Of Local Bodies: SC The Hon’ble SC has observed, in the case of State of Rajasthan vs. Ashok Khatoliya that the Constitution (Seventy-Fourth Amendment) ..

Posted in Others |   110 Views


10-Year-Old Rape Survivor Seeks Medical Abortion; Shameful And Unfortunate Act For The Society To Witness: Kerala HC

   11 March 2022 at 17:54

In YYY v. Union of India (2022), Justice P.V. Kunhikrishnan of Kerala HC granted the victim's mother's request stating that it was a shame that the victim's father was the alleged perpetrator. She added that the accused shall not be allo ..

Posted in Others |   160 Views


74th Constitutional Amendment Does Not Restrict State’s Power To Legislate In Matters Of Local Bodies: SC

   11 March 2022 at 12:29

The Hon’ble SC has observed, in the case of State of Rajasthan vs. Ashok Khatoliya that the Constitution (Seventy-Fourth Amendment) Act, 1992 does not take away the State’s power to legislate in matters pertaining to local government. In ..

Posted in Others |   121 Views


Top News Headlines 10th Mar 2022: Rajiv Gandhi Assasination Convict Perarivalan Released After 32 Years: Strong Opposition From Centre

   11 March 2022 at 10:05

Rajiv Gandhi Assasination Convict Perarivalan Released After 32 Years: Strong Opposition From Centre In a very significant development, in the case of AG Perarivalan vs State of Tamil Nadu the Hon’ble SC has granted bail to the Rajiv Gandhi ass ..

Posted in Others |   93 Views


Period Of Delay In Conclusion Of Trial, A Valid Consideration While Granting Bail: Gujarat HC

   11 March 2022 at 09:53

In Mohisin Salimbhai Quereshi V. State Of Gujrat, 2022, under the Central Goods and Services Act of 2017, Justice Gita Gopi granted bail to an accused after observing that in deciding bail applications, the Court should undoubtedly take the delay in ..

Posted in Others |   177 Views


An Attempt To Combat Violence And Evil Through Nature: Accused To Plant Saplings As Bail Condition: Trial Court To Track Growth: Madhya Pradesh HC

   10 March 2022 at 17:04

In Kalla @ Vidyaram Vs. State of MP (2022), Justice Anand Pathak overruled the Madhya Pradesh High Court's imposed condition for obtaining bail, which required a Bail Applicant to plant five seedlings of any 'fruit yielding tree' or ' ..

Posted in Others |   93 Views


Rajiv Gandhi Assasination Convict Perarivalan Released After 32 Years: Strong Opposition From Centre

   10 March 2022 at 12:05

In a very significant development, in the case of AG Perarivalan vs State of Tamil Nadu the Hon’ble SC has granted bail to the Rajiv Gandhi assasination case convict Perarivalan, who has moved the Apex Court seeking a remission of his sentence ..

Posted in Others |   170 Views


The Existence Of Statutory Appeal Does Not Bar U/A 226 Judicial Review: Allahabad HC

   10 March 2022 at 10:21

Justices Vikram D. Chauhan and Anjani Kumar Mishra, in the case of Ram Harsh v. Union of India and 4 Others (2021), ruled that the Armed Forces Tribunal Act cannot limit the powers granted by the constitution. The authority granted by Article 226 of ..

Posted in Others |   68 Views