BACKGROUND The Indian stock market scam of 1992 was a manipulation in the stock market, carried out by Harshad Mehta, with several bankers and politicians on the Bombay Stock Exchange. Harshad Mehta used several techniques such as corrupt officials s ..
FACTS OF THE CASE The Government has contended before the court of appeal that the doctrine of basic structure is not applicable in Kenya. It is so because the Constitution of India has provided the exclusive power to amend the Constitution to Parlia ..
Background of the Case The title of the case is Reena Chadha & Anr. v. Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (GNCTD). An NRI couple has filed the present Petition. The couple is requesting a physical appearance exemption for Marriage ..
Right to be Forgotten falls under Right to Privacy: Bengali Actress Granted Interim Relief The Bengali Actress has been granted interim relief by the High Court on the case of right to privacy. Her naked photos and videos had been published and strea ..
WHAT WAS THE MATTER? The Kashinath Jairam Shetye v. David Clever and Ors. (2021) case was related to the contempt of the court. The Petitioner alleged that the Respondent, who operated from the U.K. was indulging in making videos defaming judicial me ..
CASE BACKGROUND The Supreme Court recently has stated that it cannot sympathize with the students who entered the medical school through the back door. A bench of Justice Gavai, Krishna Murari, and Chief Justice L. Nageswara Rao, rejected a group of ..
CASE BACKGROUND Justices D. Y Chandrachud and M.R. Shah stated that it was necessary to set up a monitored system to track the movement of the cases between the arbitrator and the court, including all direct and indirect judgments regarding the reven ..
Background The case was Pichra Warga Kalyan Mahasabha Haryana v. State of Haryana. A notification which was issued by the Haryana State Government specified the criteria for excluding the creamy layer in backward classes. The High Court had held that ..
Background The name of the case was Tamminedi Ramakrishna v. N. Jayalakshmi. The plaintiffs had filed a suit against the defendant since the defendant was not ready to execute the sale deed. The defendant had filed applications under Order 39 Rule 1 ..
FACTS OF THE CASE In October 2019, Twitter had blocked Hegde’s account stating that it was depicting ‘hateful imagery’. He had posted a picture of August Landmesser wherein he had refused to the Nazi salute at a rally, while everyon ..
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
