Medical Practitioners Must Be Protected From Onslaught Of Frivolous ComplaintsThe Madras High Court has issued a set of guidelines for the National Medical Council. These guidelines are to be included in the new Regulations that are to be framed unde ..
Key Takeaways mere breach of contract cannot give rise to criminal prosecution for cheating. imparting criminal color to a civil dispute,is nothing but an abuse of the process of law which must be discouraged in its entiretyBackground the complaint a ..
Key Takeaways explains civil contempt means willful disobedience of a decision of the Court, and so, what is relevant is the "willful" disobedience. Liability cannot be fastened on a higher official in the absence of knowledge. vicarious li ..
Key Takeaways statement of an accused recorded under section 67 of the NDBackground Aryan Khan and his friend were apprehended together by the Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) at the International Cruise Terminal, with the friend allegedly in possessio ..
Key Takeaways Conviction in POCSO cases can be based solely on a child's statementBackground An appeal was filed by a Pollachi driver, K Ruban, challenging the prison term given to him on two counts of charges by a special court under the Protect ..
Kerala HC Quashes FIR Against Pakistan Nationals Who Came For Medical Treatment, Terms It Clear Abuse Of LawThe Kerala High Court quashed an FIR registered under the Foreigners Act against two Pakistan nationals who had reached the State for medical ..
Key Takeaways The name of the case is State of Madhya Pradesh V. Mahendra Alias Golu. The Bench that gave its judgement consisted of Justices Surya Kant and Hima Kohli. The court gave the decision while dealing with the stance of a man accused of rap ..
KEY TAKEAWAYS The name of the case related to this judgment is Rajesh Jha V. State of Uttar Pradesh. The coram included Justice Hima Kohli. In this case, the Apex Court held that it is mandatory to file a certificate along with the curative petition ..
KEY TAKEAWAYS A land dispute between the appellant and their neighbour resulted in a criminal proceeding as the appellant threw a brick at the neighbour, and made some unsavoury caste-based comments. The purpose of Section 3(1)(x) of the SC/ST Act is ..
Madras HC: Cannot Expect Eye Witness Or Independent Witness Since Culprits Exploit Child When AloneThe case was K Ruban v. State. The decision was given by Justice P Velmurugan. He Court stated that conviction of an accused in cases under the Protect ..