LCI Learning
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Arvind Singh Chauhan (advocate)     27 November 2010

WHETHER IMPEACHMENT IS ENOUGH ??

WHETHER IMPEACHMENT IS ENOUGH FOR CORRUPT JUDGES. ? WHY THEY ARE NOT ARESTED AFTER IMPEACHMENT AND NOT PROSECUTED UNDER 409 IPC, etc OR UNDER PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, WHY HARSH STEPS ARE NOT TAKEN AGAINST THEM LIKE OTHER ACUUSED AS SEIZURE OF PASSPORT, NARCO TEST, SEIZURE OF ACCOUNTS etc.



Learning

 7 Replies


(Guest)

Sir,

Why do you blame Judges for corruption. Why will the Judge become corrupt? Do the party approach directly or it is the responsibility of the Pleaders to plead. Judges never meet any party so there is no question of Judges using any unfair means. It is the pleader who uses the unfair means to get the Judgment in his favor.

So first we should first look into our own conduct and then blame the Judges.

When a judge is getting impeached, he should not be impeached alone. The people who made him corrupt should also be impeached.

Corruption will stop only when we Indians stop bribing any one. If we stop paying, nobody will demand.

Arvind Singh Chauhan (advocate)     27 November 2010

Dear  amicus curiae, Really you seems to be friend of court. Judges are expected not to receive any gretitude even if any party approaches to him. That's why they are placed like god and have good salary package and perks with diffrent type of previledges and immunities. They have wide powers they can refuse to receive any gretitude and can take action against the party who approches to him. Then why only pleaders are responsible. In Calcutta HC's matter whether any party would have approached to concerned person.? In Gaziabad PF Scam, is there any litigant's or pleader's role.?

                                                                                   Question here is not, who is responsible, question is after impeachment, why they are not treated as a common accused. Let me know any example when  a magistrate or judge  has been suspended or terminated for corruption, and then arested, prosecuted or punished like oridinary public servant.  No they are terminated simply but not prosecuted like oridinary public servant.

2 Like

Arup (UNEMPLOYED)     27 November 2010

mr arvind i fully support you. thanks for raising this issue.


(Guest)

Respected Sir,

Please refer to the Recent Judgement by the Division Bench of Hon'ble Justice Shri. Markanday Katju and Hon'ble Justice Shri. Gyan Sudha Mishra.  Something is rotten in Allahabad High court. This Observation by the learned Judges is quite right and Judiciary is moving in right direction. It will be incorrect to put a common label on all the Learned Judges.

If this is true the system will just collapse. Who takes the dates in court, Who files the adjournments, despite of Well settled Legal Proposition That either party cannot take more that 3 Adjourments, do we follow the same. The Junior Advocate will come and file the adjournment mentioning that Senior Counsel has gone to some other court. 

All of us are responsible for this rotten lot. It is great pleasure to see Seniors like your good self are taking action in this direction by raising the points and sooner or later we shall see the light at the end of tunnel.

Arup (UNEMPLOYED)     27 November 2010

" Judiciary is moving in right direction"

- IT IS EXPECTED BUT SORRY TO SAY, THAT THE DIRECTION NOT APPROPRIATE.

Arup (UNEMPLOYED)     27 November 2010

THE MASTER SAYS - HIS SERVENTS DOING WRONG.

 

- :  IT IS BOGUS AND MEANINGLESS, BECAUSE THE DUTY OF THE MSATER IS TO SET RIGHT THE THINGS.

Bhartiya No. 1 (Nationalist)     28 November 2010

I fully agree with Adv Arvind.

The buck must stop somewhere. No blame game.

Justices are holding resposible Posts, so their unreasonable behavriour is unpardonable and buck stop at them.


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register