Exclusive HOLI Discounts!
Get Courses and Combos at Upto 50% OFF!
Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Legal Fighter (Advocate)     24 September 2010

What is Impounding of passport by passport authorities?

An Indian accused is in USA and he received a show cause notice (at Indian address) from passport officer and later his passport has been impounded? As far as I understand, impounding of passport means seizure of passport means "to seize and retain the passport in legal custody by Passport Office". Now as the person is not in india, how can his passport be impounded?



Learning

 3 Replies

N.K.Assumi (Advocate)     24 September 2010

SC – Police Or Courts Cannot Impound Passports

Excerpts:

12. It may be mentioned that there is a difference between seizing of a document and impounding a document. A seizure is made at particular moment when a person or authority takes into his possession some property, which was earlier not in his possession. Thus, seizure is done at a particular moment of time. However, if after seizing of property or document the said property or document is retained foursome period of time, then such retention amounts to impounding of the property/or document. In the Law Lexicon by P. Ra m a n a th a Aiyar (2 nd Edition), the word “impound” has been defined to mean “to take possession of a document or thing for being held in custody in accordance with law”.
Thus, the word “impounding” really means retention of possession of a good or a document, which has been seized.
13. Hence, while the police may have power to seize a passport under Section 102 Cr. P.C. if it is permissible within the authority given under Section 1 0 2 of Cr.P .C., it does not have power to retain or impound the same, because that can only be done by the passport authority under Section 1 0( 3) of the P a s sports Act. Hence, if the police seizes a passport (which it has power to do under Section 1 0 2 Cr.P .C.), thereafter the police must send it along with a letter to the passport authority clearly stating that the seized passport deserves to be impounded for one of the reasons mentioned in Section 10(3) of the Act. It is thereafter the passport authority to decide whether to impound the passport or not. Since impounding of a passport has civil consequences, the passport authority must give an opportunity of hearing to the person concerned before impounding his passport. It is well settled that any order which has civil consequences must be passed after giving opportunity of hearing to a party vide State of Orissa Vs. Binap ani Dei[Air 1967 SC 1269 ]

 


(Guest)

Innumerable laws exist only in countries which are very corrupt as there are too many loopholes. He can change his name, change his religion and get a phony passport from Ivory Coast. Case laws work in India only if you know a judge or two through the backdoor. I know criminals who have dozens of phony passports , phony SIMS from various counries. Republic of India has withered away.

Sudhir Kumar, Advocate (Advocate)     19 January 2013

is the accused attending dates.


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register