cpc

sanction for prosecution under crpc 197 for public servant


An IO filed filed charge sheet U/sec 173(2) , in which he presented a doctored statement (suppressed & manipulated)  to that of the 161 statements of PWs. This act has been done to save an accused from legal punishment.  Does this act attracts IPC sec 217 and 218?  If so, then sanction from state u/sec 197crpc required to register FIR against the IO (S.I or C.I rank) or not?

 

 
Reply   
 
Lawyer

Yes, permission from appropriate authority is must for prosecution of such employee.

 
Reply   
 


Retired employee.

First, follow the usual procedure of reporting on deficiencies or manipulation of IO to higher authorities as a complaint and also as grievance and create a record  to show that all attempts have been made to bring the attention of Higher authorities on such defective/compromising/connived report.  Follow all precautions while complaining against a public servant and approach a court only when you can afford financially and mentally.

 
Reply   
 

@omprakash sir, in that case, accused applied for further investigation and the order granted u/sec 173(8). Now checking for the ways to rope in IO for golmal investigation report coz of bribe. 

 
Reply   
 
Advocate

It is really surprising that a person other than the original author is offering the clarification. More than a query, the posting is turning out to be a game of hide and seek!

 
Reply   
 

LEAVE A REPLY


    

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  


 

  Search Forum








×

Menu

IPC Grand Course     |    x