Section 311 in The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973
person in attendance, though not summoned as a witness, or. recall and re- examine any person already examined
Central Government Act
Anandamay Bag vs State Of West Bengal And Anr. on 7 May, 2007
person in attendance, though not summoned as a witness, or recall and re-examine, any person already examined ... Court shall summon and examine or recall and re-examine any such person of his evidence appears
Sanjeev Nanda vs State Of Nct Of Delhi on 29 May, 2007
ground that it declined the request for recall of the 9 witnesses sought for, as in the overall circumstances ... person in attendance, though not summoned as a witness, or recall and re-examine any person already examined
State Of Gujarat vs Patel Naran Devji on 24 September, 1990
under this Code, summon any person as a witness, or recall and re-examine any person already examined ... judgment of the case, the Magistrate may call or recall witness and examine as a Court witness order Section
Section 6(1) in The Prevention Of Corruption Act, 1988 [ "Section 6" ] record an order to that effect and thereafter recall any witnesses who may have been examined and proceed to hear
K. Veeraswami vs Union Of India And Others on 25 July, 1991
accompanied with all the documents and statements of wit- nesses as required by Section 175(5). Nothing more need ... question. In this context, it is useful to recall the analysis of Section 6 made in R.S. Nayak
M.R. Natarajan vs State By Cbi Spe/Eow on 8 April, 2005
amount by signing. If P.W.1 is a trustworthy witness, when Ex.D1 was shown to him, he should have accepted ... appears, in order to explain the receipt, P.W.1 was recalled on 25.2.1997. Only at that time, P.W.1 had explained
Major E. G. Barsay vs The State Of Bombay on 24 April, 1961
accomplice, he was an interested witness and required corroboration. The evidence of an approver and the corroborating pieces of evidence ... leave from October 25, 1954, was recalled to duty by accused No. 1 and was put in charge
Section 325 in The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973
thinks fit, examine the parties and recall and examine any witness who has already given evidence in the case
Central Government Act
II Addl. Judicial First Class Magistrate vs State Of A.P. Represented By The Public Prosecutor on 7 September, 2004
witnesses cited to be examined and all the witnesses were cross-examined. At this stage, the learned Magistrate felt that ... thinks fit, examine the parties and recall and examine any witness who has already given evidence in the case
Selvaraj, S/O Gnanadesihan vs P. Viswanathan on 22 July, 1999
thinks fit, examine the parties and recall and examine any witness who has already given evidence in the case ... thinks it necessary, he can examine the parties recall any witness and take further evidence. Therefore, it is open
Enumula Subbarao And Ors. vs The State on 4 July, 1978
cross-examined statements of the prosecution witnesses recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C. The other contention was that the learned Asst ... inherent powers in the Subordinate Court to recall or review its own orders. Thus, it is contended that the framing
Section 242 in The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973
other witness or witnesses have been examined or recall any witness for further cross- examination
Central Government Act
Prem Raj vs State Of Rajasthan And Ors. on 10 August, 1998
person in attendance, though not summoned as a witness, or recall and re-examine any person already examined ... other witness or witnesses have been examined or recall any witness for further cross-examination. A bare reading
Jagadguru Sachidananda Shankarabharathi Swami Of Sri ... vs State Of Mysore on 3 April, 1968
counsel appeared and filed an application for recalling the warrant. The Court ordered not to issue warrant against ... contended that there is no difficulty for the prosecution witnesses to identify the accused as they identify him by name
State Of Karnataka vs Annegowda on 13 July, 2006
other witness or witnesses have been examined or recall any witness for further cross-examination." Section 242 of the Cr.P.C ... other witness or witnesses have been examined or recall any witness for further cross-examination. It does not deal with
Section 259 in The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973
trial of warrant- cases and may recall an witness who may have been examined. CHAP SUMMARY TRIALS. CHAPTER XXI SUMMARY
Central Government Act
Shankarrao S/O Kashinath Pode vs Pandurang S/O Sambhaji Kutarmare And Anr. on 4 March, 2005
also not disputed that thereafter the evidence of two witnesses was recorded and then complainant moved the Magistrate by filing ... trial of warrant cases and may recall any witness who may have been examined." 8. In the present case
Mukesh And Etc. Etc. vs State Of Rajasthan on 30 September, 1997
Public Prosecutor the learned Judge permitted him to recall such witnesses for examination and cross-examination as he may deem ... desire to recall, re-summon and re-examine any witness already examined. Under all such facts and circumstances
State Of Gujarat vs Bava Bhadya And Anr. on 18 July, 1961
cross-examine the witnesses, the witnesses named by him should be recalled. It appears that the learned trial Magistrate ... examine the witnesses for the prosecution and to recall Such witness whose cross-examination the accused desire. It is difficult
Section 260 in The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973
undesirable to try it summarily, the Magistrate shall recall any witnesses who may have been examined and proceed
Central Government Act
State Of Gujarat vs Bachubhai Naginbhai Shah And Ors. on 21 November, 1994
undesirable to try it summarily, the Magistrate shall recall any witnesses who may have been examined and proceed to rehear ... Criminal Procedure enjoins upon the Magistrate to recall any witness in the course of a summary trial, if it appears
Mukesh And Etc. Etc. vs State Of Rajasthan on 30 September, 1997
Public Prosecutor the learned Judge permitted him to recall such witnesses for examination and cross-examination as he may deem ... desire to recall, re-summon and re-examine any witness already examined. Under all such facts and circumstances
A. Krishna Reddy vs State And Another on 21 September, 1999
taken that is, not in, a summary way. The witnesses were elaborately cross-examined. As a matter of fact ... summary way was intended. It may be recalled with reference to objects and reasons behind Sections
Section 246 in The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973
says he does so wish, the witnesses named by him shall be recalled and, after cross- examination and re- examination ... shall be discharged. (6) The evidence of any remaining witnesses for the prosecution shall next be taken, and after cross
Central Government Act
Verendra Kumar vs Aashraya Makers And Anr. on 20 April, 1999
says he does so wish, the witnesses named by him shall be recalled and, after cross-examination and re-examination ... shall be discharged. (6) The evidence of any remaining witnesses for the prosecution shall next be taken and after cross
Sri T.Krishna Murthy, S/O.Pottanna, vs Deep Chand Agarwal, S/O.Late Chenganmal, on 25 April, 2005
says he does so wish, the witnesses named by him shall be recalled and, after cross-examination and re-examination ... shall be discharged. (6) The evidence of any remaining witnesses for the prosecution shall next be taken, and after cross
Nallapu Prahalad vs 1. K.Chandrasekhar And Another on 9 March, 2005
says he does so wish, the witnesses named by him shall be recalled and. after cross-examination and re-examination ... shall be discharged. (6) The evidence of any remaining witnesses for the prosecution shall next be taken, and after cross
Section 231 in The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [ "Complete Act" ]
other witness or witnesses have been examined or recall any witness for further cross- examination
Central Government Act
Moosa Abdul Rahiman And Anr. vs State Of Kerala on 2 April, 1982
Procedure Code, 1898. Section 217 reads as follows: Recall of witnesses when charge altered: Whenever a charge is altered ... enquire of the accused whether they would recall previous witnesses or summon new ones. The decision in Mohan
Jayakar vs The State, By Frazer Town Police on 10 July, 1996
other witness or witnesses have been examined or recall any witness for further cross-examination." 7. The cross-examination
Md. Sanjoy And Md. Mahtab vs The State Of West Bengal on 23 August, 1999
other witness or witnesses have been examined or recall any witness for further cross-examination." 3. it Is true that
Section 217 in The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [ "Complete Act" ]
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 217. Recall of witnesses when charge altered. Whenever a charge is altered or added ... case may be, desires to recall or re- examine such witness for the purpose of vexation or delay
Central Government Act
- Cites 0 - Cited by 35
Moosa Abdul Rahiman And Anr. vs State Of Kerala on 2 April, 1982
Procedure Code, 1898. Section 217 reads as follows: Recall of witnesses when charge altered: Whenever a charge is altered ... enquire of the accused whether they would recall previous witnesses or summon new ones. The decision in Mohan
T.P.G. Nambiar And Others vs The Ragistrar Of Companies, Karnataka, Bangalore on 5 February, 1997
laid, the prosecution produces the statements of the witnesses recorded under Section 161 of the Code in support ... judgment. It can be varied or recalled. The fact that the process has already been issued
Mansur Ahmad S/O Abdul Haque, Kalim Ahmad S/O Rafiq Ahmad ... vs State Of U.P. And Maqbool Ahmad S/O Mahboob Ahmad on 15 September, 2006
that learned Trial Court had no power to recall the witness under Section 311 Cr.P.C. for further cross examine ... final order as the Court has power to recall the witnesses at any stage of the trial if it considers
Section 16A in The Prevention Of Food Adulteration Act, 1954
record an order to that effect and thereafter recall any witness who may have been examined and proceed to hear
Central Government Act
Basin vs State on 30 November, 1978
record an order to that effect and thereafter recall any witness who may have been examined and proceed to hear
Roshan Lal vs State Of Haryana on 22 May, 1987
which was attested by Ram Parkash, an independent witness, associated by the Food Inspector from there ... record an order to that effect and thereafter recall any witness who may have been examined and proceed to hear
Rajendra Alias Rajjan vs State Of Rajasthan on 16 December, 1987
record an order to that effect and thereafter recall any witness who may have been examined and proceed to hear ... record an order to that effect and thereafter recall any witness who may have been examined and proceed to hear
