Preetpal singh Guliani (ADVOCATE) 20 June 2008
Rohit Krishan Naagpal (Advocate) 20 June 2008
As per law it is not required but u still ned it as per highc ourt rules !
Srinivas.B.S.S.T ( Advocate) 20 June 2008
There are no judgment with repect to that as far i know, may be our friends will comeup with one. But it is a procedural aspect. As there is the procedure followed in general while filing appeals in highcourt they tend to as for vakalat, as the vakalat in the lower court doesnot form part of the case record which will be sent to high court on appeal call.
Srinivas.B.S.S.T ( Advocate) 22 June 2008
yes you said the point
K.C.Suresh (Advocate) 22 June 2008
I think Mr. Kotresh MG is correct. Each HC has specified rules in all matters. It may be different. As law says there must be either a memo of appearnece or Vakkalath. for appearence before the Hon.HC Adv.K.C.Suresh
arunprakaash.m. (advocate) 23 June 2008
only nomencalture is different . there is no difference between vakalathnama and memo of appearence.
pawankumardhanuka (laywer) 28 June 2008
there is no judgments
Srinivas.B.S.S.T ( Advocate) 28 June 2008
there are no judgments
Kiran Kumar (Lawyer) 29 June 2008
dear friend,
there r no specific judgments in this regard, but if u c the top of the Power of Attorney or Vakalatnama......its a court specific.
when u change the forum or the hirearchy of court then u ll ve to file a fresh one.
Guest (n/a) 29 September 2008
Hello
I want know about General Boby Meeting in Church's
1.procedure
2.law
prof s c pratihar (medical practitioner &legal studies) 29 September 2008
in cal HC commissioner will reject and refused affirmation and computer will not allow numbering of case if voka is not there.
Member Strength 9,47,460 and growing..
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
