Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

G.Nagarajeshwar Rao (Advocate)     15 May 2011

Photos can not prove the possession of the party-citation?

Hi all of you!

I request you to kindly help me in the aspect that "One can not prove his possession with the photographs" or " Photos can not prove the possession of a party". The citations are required. Thanks one and all.  



Learning

 8 Replies

pratik (self working)     15 May 2011

i would also required. 

adv. rajeev ( rajoo ) (practicing advocate)     15 May 2011

Mere photos cannot decide the tittle of the property, it requires regd., tittle deed.
1 Like

N.K.Assumi (Advocate)     15 May 2011

Agreed with adv.rajeev(rajoo)

Y V Vishweshwar Rao (Advocate )     15 May 2011

 @ GNR Sharama - Phoots -showing actual construction  by  one party with the workers and by physical presence fo the Party can proved that  the party constructed  the Sturctures - However -  hsi legal entitlemtn to construct -  his title  and possession must be supported by  acceptable documentary  evidence -. the Photos will support he other valid Documentary  evidence - a fact  who cinstructed  the Structures -or - a fact who demolished the structures -can be proved by phootes ! Photos and it relevancy  defers form case to case and proof  of fact on some  aspects can be taken in to coisnideration- on  photos ! Citations ! i will try to locate 

1 Like

Y V Vishweshwar Rao (Advocate )     15 May 2011

Originally posted by :Y V Vishweshwar Rao
"

 @ GNR Sharma - Phoots -showing actual construction  by  one party with the workers and by Physical presence of  the Party can prove  that  the party constructed  the Sturctures - However -  his  legal entitlment  to construct -  his title  and  valid possession must be supported by  acceptable documentary  evidence -. the Photos will support he other valid Documentary  evidence - a fact  who constructed  the Structures -or - a fact who demolished the structures -can be proved by phootes ! Photos and it relevancy  defers form case to case and proof  of fact on some  aspects can be taken in to coisnideration- on  photos ! Citations ! I will try to locate 
"
1 Like

Navjot Kumar (Lawyer)     16 May 2011

Sir, 

I am fully agreed with my another frd rajeev, merely photographs of property does not prove the title of property, u should have to file the a application u/o 7 rule 11 CPC , they have not file prove of property so suit shall be rejected on solely ground , for prove any tilted of provery u have to show regd. sale deed or regd. will duly probated by the court concerned. 

G.Nagarajeshwar Rao (Advocate)     16 May 2011

sir! I required citations on that aspect. If any citation is found kindly post. 

G.Nagarajeshwar Rao (Advocate)     20 May 2011

Respected members / experts of this site!

I found some infromation in a commetary with regarding to the above query. The concept of the law in that commentary is " Mere sale deed in respect of land in dispute and photographs showing some crops over it - not sufficient to prove possession of purchaser. Ad-interim-injunction order can not be passed in favour of purchaser". The cases referred under that concept are 

1996 AIHC 5606 [5607] Delhi,

1996 AIHC 4274 [4277]

[1997] 1 ICC 145 [Delhi]

[1996] 1 Mad. L.W. 13 [17]

[1996] 1 ICC 755

AIR 1995 All. 418 [419]

1996 All.LJ. 39

[1996] 4 ICC 518

how far the above judgments are helpful on that aspect. The full text is not available to me. 


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  


Recent Topics


View More

Related Threads


Loading