Hi all,
I hope you elite members would enlighten me with respect to the matter i enlisted below:
When i were taking the chief examination of my client, I filed proof affidavit along with documents to be marked in the trial court. The trial court accepted all documents except one. The one which is being left out is the photograph which was taken 20 years back. Since its old one I did file the photograph only and not the negative of it as it was lost. The trial court refused it even i put forth that it may be marked subject to objection. After left out the photograph trial court marked all the documents. So the crux of the thing i would like to know from you all is whether the photograph without negative can be filed under exceptional circumstances; whether negative can be raised on the image of this photograph newly,, is it permitted under law? ...Do give me case laws n judgments so that i can armour myself to fight for my right !!!
