prasanna kumar (individual) 26 September 2025
T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate (Advocate) 26 September 2025
This is violation of the high court order, the status quo order is applicable for all the parties to the litigation, hence it can be considered as contempt of court.
You can collect evidence on this and file a memo before high court seeking to vacate the status quo order since he had violated the court order.
You may please note that a willful violation of a high court's status quo order is considered civil contempt of court, according to the Supreme Court.
Instead of merely vacating the interim order, the Supreme Court has stated that contempt proceedings should be initiated to address the willful disobedience.
This is because disobeying a court's order, especially one affecting possession or the existing state of affairs, amounts to a contempt of court under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971
Dr. J C Vashista (Advocate ) 26 September 2025
I fully agree and endorse the very well explained, opinion and advise of learned senior expert Mr. T Kalaiselvan.
Move a contempt petition through your lawyer before the same court with proper evidence(s) for wilful disobidience of order (to maintain status quo) qua renting out the property purchased by auction purchaser.
R.K Nanda (Advocate) 26 September 2025
Status quo order means keep disputed property in current position and no changes can be done by parties .if any change is made by a party then other party can file contempt petition in same court.
P. Venu (Advocate) 26 September 2025
Yes, the action on the part of the auction purchaser amounts to contempt of court.
prasanna kumar (individual) 29 September 2025
Forum members can you please take action against this man shailesh who has written absurd comments not related to the topic. it is shear violation of the forums dignity.. May be remove the entire comment and abuser form the forum.
Thanks