Dear all Experts, There is no limit of favourism and support to a woman in a family matter or can say sky is the limit and therefore in a recent judgment of a family court in respect of interim maintenance to CHILD it was awarded the DOUBLE the amount which was demanded by the wife and the interim maintenance of WIFE rejected as per merit of the case and based on the documents on records and permanent sufficient earning (service) of a wife.
It reveals that court has indirectly merged the maintenance of wife into maintenance of the child after showing favour and thus it is a totally contradictory judgment because on one side the court is accepting that wife is in service and maintaining herself very well and therefore rejected her maintenance and on the other side as per principle governed by the various high courts and Supreme court that maintaining a child is not the responsibility of farther alone if wife is working and therefore she has to share her responsibility to maintain the child as per proportionate earning of both husband and wife and thus the court ought to have reduced or fixed the maintenance accordingly instead of increasing to Double of the demand of the wife which shows that pure justice has been forcefully tilted towards the wife.
THUS THIS ASPECTS HAS COMPLETELY AVOIDED BY THE FAMILY COURT.
The further regular hearing is in progress in the matter and in the circumstances how to plead further our case so that the court realize this anomaly and delivered the final judgment according to fair justice.
