indian bank., tenali branch ,a.o., vijayawada illegal claim


I AM IN GREAT TROUBLE WITH INDIAN BANK., TENALI EVEN CLEARED THE ENTIRE DEBT. DRT PASSED A SYMPATHETIC DECREE IN FAVOUR OF BANK AS "" "'THERE IS NO EXPLANATION FROM THE BANK SO FAR AS MAINTAINING OF THE ACCOUNT IS CONCERNED AND IT IS CLEAR IN ALL THE BANK CASES AND THE ACCOUNT COPY WILL FASTEN THE LIABILITY BUT IN THIS CASE THE ACCOUNT ITSELF IS INCORRECT AND PEOPLE WILL BELIEVE THE ACCOUNT COPY OF THE BANK AND THIS ACCOOUUNT COPY SEEMS TO BE TOTALLY INCORRECT IN VIEW OF THE SEVERAL PAY IN SLIPS FILED BY THE DEFENDANTS WHICH ARE MARKED AS EX. B13 TO EX. B18 CONTAINING MANY BOOKS. IN THESE CIRCUMSTANCES THE ACCOUNT COPY CANNOT BE BELIEVED AND THEREFORE THE OA HAS TO BE ALLOWED ONLY FOR THE AMOUNT OF RS. 11,28,685/- WITH SIMPLE INTEREST @6% PER ANNUM FROM THE DATE OF OA TILL REALISATION. THIS RECOVERY CERTIFICATE IS BEING ISSUED SINCE IT IS PUBLIC MONEY AND THERE IS NO DOCUMENT TO SHOW HOW MUCH AMOUNT IS ACTUALLY DUE TO THE APPLICANT BANK. THE BANK NEVER PROVED THE AMOUNT DUE . IT IS THE INTIAL BURDEN ON THE BANK ACCORDING TO THE EVIDENCE ACT SEC. 101 TO 103 , AND THE INTIAL BURDEN IS NOT DISCARGED BY THE BANK. THEREFORE, THE BANK CANNOT BASE ON THE DEMERITS OF THE DEFEENDANTS CASE." THEN APPROACHED APEX COURT PASSED ORDER AS "" THE RESPONDENT BANK is hereby directed TO PREPARE THE DETAILLS OF AMOUNTS DEPOSITED BY THE BORROWER AND ALSO FDRS DETAILS WITH ACCURED INTEREST AS ON THE DATE OF THE ALLEGED ADJUSTMENTS , AND SUCH STATEMENT S SHALL BE FURNISHED TO THE BORROWER: WHEREUPON THE APPELLANTS COULD FILE OBJECTIONS, IF ANY AND THEREAFTER THE P.O SHALL ALLOW THEM TO ADDUCE ORAL EVIDENCE ON THAT LIMITED SCOPE AND AFTER HEARING BOTH SIDES, THE P.O, DRT SHALL DECIDE THE MATTER. TWO MONTHS TIME IS GRANTED TO FURNISH SUCH DETAILED STATEMENT. BOTH SIDES SHALL APPEAR BEFORE THE DRT, VISAKHAPATNAM ON 26/3/2015. THIS APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF ACCORDINGLY SETTING ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER OF THE DRT AND BY REMITTING THE MATTER BACK TO DRT AS AFORESAID." BUT DRT NOT FUNCTIONING DUE TO LACK OF OFFICERS. THEN APPROACHED HIGH COURT, BUT THE BANK NOT RESPONDING. ONLY BRANCH MANAGER FILED VAKALAT NOT FILING COUNTER GOING ON ASK TIME. REPORTED TO CHAIRMAN AND OTHER OFFICERS BUT THEY ARE WATCHING PICTURE. MY POSITION LOOKS LIKE OPERATION SUCESS BUT PATIENT DEAD. WHAT TO DO? ANYBODY GREAT EXPERT ADVISE?
 
Reply   
 
Chief Lawyer

Sri AKS Prasad Meet in Vijayawada with all ur Case Papers on dis Saturday Call me before u come My Cell 91777-22930
 
Reply   
 


LEAVE A REPLY


    

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  



 

  Search Forum








×

  LAWyersclubindia Menu

CrPC MASTERCLASS     |    x