Surendra Parmar 22 October 2020

HOW TO SETTLE THE MATTER IF BOTH THE PARTY ARE READY TO SETTLE THE MATTER IS IT ? JUDGE WILL PASSED THE ORDER IN ACCUSED FAVOUR

IN RAJASTHAN SC / ST CASTE BHIM LEADER HAVE MADE ALLEGATION ON MY FRIEND IN 2019. WITH IPC 1908
UNDER SECTION 505
SC/ST ATROCITIES ACT UNDER SECTION 3
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
UNDER SECTION 67
MATTER IS RUNNING STILL IN RAJASTHAN . MY FRIEND HAVE ARRESTED IN THIS MATTER AND PRODUCED TO A SESSION COURT . IN SESSION COURT THE MATTER IS RUNNING FROM PAST ONE YEAR . AND COMPLAINANT ARE READY TO SETTLE THE MATTER . AND MY FRIEND IS ALSO READY TO SETTLE TYE MATTER
BUT MY FRIEND ADVOCATE IS NOT READY TO SETTLE THE MATTER .HE SAY THAT WAIT FOR BEST TIME. I KNOW THAT HE IS GETTING PAYMENT ON EACH DATE ITS ADVOCATE BUSINESS I KNOW THAT. SUPPOSE MY ADVOCATE IS NOT READY TO SETTLE THE MATTER THEN WHAT WE HAVE TO DO PLS SUGGEST THAT. I KNOW THAT MY FRIEND CAN CHANGE THE ADV WITH RESPECT TO VAKALATNAMA SUPPOSED HE READY TO SIGN ON VAKALTNAMA.
THEN MY MAIN MOTIVE IS ,IF BOTH THE PARTIES & ADV OF BOTH THE PARTIES ARE READY THEN IS IT ? SESSION JUDGE WILL SETTLE THE MATTER OR PASSED THE ORDER IN MY FRIEND FAVOR..
I HOPE U WILL LOOK INTO THIS QUERY AND REWART
ME AS SOON AS POSSIBLE .....
PLS SUGGEST ME ON WHAT GROUND SESSION JUDGE WILL PASSED THE ORDER ON MY FRIEND...

Reply Follow

Quick Summary

This discussion concerns a legal case in Rajasthan where the complainant and the accused are both willing to settle. However, the accused's advocate is delaying the settlement, suggesting they wait for a better time, which the user suspects is due to ongoing payments. The user is seeking advice on how to proceed if the advocate refuses to facilitate the settlement, including whether a Session Judge will automatically rule in favour of the accused if both parties and their advocates agree to settle.

4 Replies

Adv Vinay Mathur + 8447131770 (Advocate) 22 October 2020

None of the above sections are compoundable, you should approach HC in your state and see if charges can be condon or quashed or HC accepts compromise