Crpc 211, 212, 213 have provided for the procedure to be followed for framing of charges.
Now, it also suggests keeping in view several SC judgements that if accused is misled or prejudice due to improper procedure being followed then how to show it?
Because the charge framing is done oral in the presence of judge, advocate & accused?
How can that be proved at later stage that there was improper procedure followed as there is no videographic or documentary evidence to show so?
In the absence facts, the posting is a riddle than a query. Please post facts.
