My Business 07 March 2021
Real Soul.... (LEGAL) 08 March 2021
That can be a debt returned back, You cannot colloaborate without any suppourting evidance. There should be solid proof that the money was send for any perticular pupose
Sudhir Kumar (Retd Govt Officer) 08 March 2021
|Originally posted by : Real Soul....|
|That can be a debt returned back, You cannot colloaborate without any suppourting evidance. There should be solid proof that the money was send for any perticular pupose|
following such path can lead to irrepairable trap.
If you claim it was refund of a debt and thereby you admit demand as well as acceptance. Now all the prosecution has to prove that it was gratification only.
It then you who have to prove that it was refund of a debt by showing papers or other proof that the person who sent you money (i) did owe you money (ii) and more of refund by phone was accepted by you.
Even if criminal proceedings may not succeed but for departmental inqjuiry it is sufficient to punish you if it is proved that (i) you had official dealing with person; and (ii) money came to you as consideration.
First of all it appears that it is you because you are staring that "my friend is working a Govt servant"
later you said "actually I never asked for any amount"
Then it is seen that you are not able to convey facts cogently. If you readdly want proper advise you should consult someone with relevant papers.