Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

veer (e md)     18 February 2015

Extra remarks (tampering) in highcourt ordersheet ,guide us

sir,
kindly see attached file.
or refer url: 

https://highcourt.cg.gov.in/interimorder/13/WP(CR)98_13(17.10.13).pdf


see on the top right corner of the ordersheet,

Whereas in actual order it clearly says that the petition was withdrawn by the petitioner.

there is a handwritten comment in a seprate handwriting which states the following; 
"Police authorities is direct to take action u/s 452"

(note grammatical errors and spelling errors )

Tip: 
To my surprise, even the certified copy of the ordersheet taken from highcourt and the copy which is uploaded over the website also has the same comment.

Itis clear that the comment was marked by some of the sub-ordinate in the registry/court.

However we have faced serious damage because of this comment, i.e. the petitioner here who withdrew his actual petition has managed to join hands with police and got the police to take action based on this false remark.

I want to know if this kind of practice is followed in highcourts?
if yes, than it has to be stopped and the person who did so is supposed to be prosecuted.
Any how we need your guidance to proceed further with this complaint and under which law this kind of mischevious act can be dealt.

kindly suggest.
contact me: 
email: vsmedi@gmail.com 



Learning

 0 Replies


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  


Recent Topics


View More

Related Threads


Loading