Disparity in voluntarily retirement policies


I was released by Air India in March 2016. At that time, i was not eligible for Voluntarily retirement.

After 1 year of release, new policy was formed in 2017. As per that i am eligible for Voluntarily retirement and its benefits.

I requested company to consider me as a Voluntarily retired as per 2017 policy and release order for providing me benefits. But HR refused.

But the right of getting benefits should be the same within the same organisation irrespective of release time of different employees under different policies.

Is it not violation of Article 16?

How should i proceed in this situation?

 
Reply   
 
Advocate

Facts posted suggest no discrimination. However, there is no harm in making a representation or convincing the employees'union in taking up the issue.

 
Reply   
 



The application highlights inclining news, photographs, status recordings, and significantly more for clients. Chingari App is accessible in various dialects, including free chingari generator English, Hindi, Bangla, Gujarati, Marathi, Kannada, Punjabi, Malayalam, Tamil, Telugu, and others.

 
Reply   
 

It means there is no legal stand?

 
Reply   
 
Dy Director

rep[eated

 

https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/forum/inadverdently-resigned-instead-of-voluntarily-retirement-211330.asp

 
Reply   
 

What does the clause, according to which you are eligible, says ? - S K Mittal Labour & Industrial Lawyer Delhi/NCR 9319956443, 8077779793 skmittal.labourlaw@gmail.com
 
Reply   
 

LEAVE A REPLY


    

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  


 

  Search Forum








×

Menu

Post a Suggestion for LCI Team
Post a Legal Query
Forensics & Evidence     |    x