T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate (Advocate) 30 July 2023
When the high court had passed an order permitting y0u to file a fresh petition before the single judge bench to seek the relief agaisnt the enlargment of the accused on bail, it appears that you had not approached that bench for relief under section 340 cr.p.c.
The problem with the original petition was that you sought to cancel the anticipatory bail and as the bail was granted by a different court, the petition under section 340 cr.p.c. would be maintainbable before that court alone and not before this court where the quash petition was being heard.
Actually what were you doing all these three years, why you were sitting idle all these years, does it indicate that you are not serous about this issue? or whether you were negotiating with the accused and since the terms could not be negotiated that you had reverted to resume the disconnected legal actions?
T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate (Advocate) 31 July 2023
There is no more necessity to advise you on any legal issue because you are knowing everything well and better than an y advocate including your own advocate and you have scant respect for law or the legal frternity. and of course this thought of yours will be a permanent obstacle preventing you from getting any relief now or in future.
If you feel being defamed you proceed with taking legal action.
Before that please remember that this is a legal forum where the advises are given at free of cost to the needy people and it is a voluntary service.