Evidence in Question and answer form was held in a case
Question was asked from a witness but inspite of Answering he with intent to fill lacuna of what he has left to state in his document (previous statement) gave a full explanation (which was not asked)
Q. See it is not written on panchnama that you taken milk after stiring it and after making it homogenious?
Ans (By Witness) On dated ..... I went to ............. place. I saw him selling milk...... as per rules I made it homogenious and I made accused to stire milk for me.
Now since witness has not written stiring of milk on panchnama he inspite of giving my answer he explained whole fact though it was not asked and neither it was written on panchnama not it was there on examination in chief
Now my question is since my question remained unanswered what is validity of answer given by witness.