ALL THE RESPECTED MEMBERS OF THIS FORUM PLS GIVE ME ANS. MY QUERY.
IF BAIL JUMPED ACCUSED.ARREST WARRANT ISSUED BY COURT.ARRESTED ACCCUSED PERSENT BEFORE COURT BY POLICE.. IN WHICH SECTION APPLLY BEFOR COURT FOR BAIL.
THANX
MIS. SMITH SHARMA[LAWYER]
smith sharma (lecturer) 01 September 2008
ALL THE RESPECTED MEMBERS OF THIS FORUM PLS GIVE ME ANS. MY QUERY.
IF BAIL JUMPED ACCUSED.ARREST WARRANT ISSUED BY COURT.ARRESTED ACCCUSED PERSENT BEFORE COURT BY POLICE.. IN WHICH SECTION APPLLY BEFOR COURT FOR BAIL.
THANX
MIS. SMITH SHARMA[LAWYER]
deepak kumar (Advocate) 01 September 2008
in cases of misuse of priviledge of bail when a person appears or is brought before court by police the general sections of bail will apply i.e either section 437 or 439 of the CrPC depending upon the court in which bail is filed. There is no different section.
advocatesdiary.blogspot.com
aruntrivedi (lawyer) 01 September 2008
What Learned Deepak has said is right - there is no different section. But in such cases when once the person has jumped and flee away and rearrested so far I think no bail shall be granted for him.
Ajay kumar singh (Advocate) 01 September 2008
rajvinder (lawter) 01 September 2008
REGULAR BAIL APPL
Ravi Arora (Advocate) 01 September 2008
Mr. deepak is right
regular bail application
there must be strong reason for not attending the court on the dates fixed
than only you will get bail
Mohit Attri (lawyer) 02 September 2008
frstly u have to check that wht type of offence is it......bailable or non bailable aftr the apply the section abve said by mr deepak
prof s c pratihar ( urologist &legal studies) 02 September 2008
only that court can consider and dispose of the bail application either under437 or under439,crpc in whose custody the accused isfor the time being and mere issuance of production of warrant us.267 crpcis not sufficient to deem the custody of that court which issued such warrantunless the accused isactually produced in that court in pursuance of each production warrant.pawan kr panday vs state of up1997cri l j2686 aii.(just a little addition of already replied by respected members) drsc pratihar
Guest (n/a) 02 September 2008
smith sharma (lecturer) 03 September 2008
THANX TO ALL OF U.
Guest (n/a) 10 September 2008
I daresay you're 'correcto-mundo', Mr. do not matters does not matter (Guest). Mr. smith sharma ("lawyer"!) has posed an encrypted trick question (way beyond the comprehension of the common English-speaking mortal) to which he deserves a righteous encrypted answer. After due deliberation, I came up with the following legally irrefutable answer: “DUH?”