Respected Experts there was a tri-partite consent terms entered between Accused, Complainant and daughter of Complainant ... Where consent terms are made on a rupees hundred stamp paper. As per main conditions of consent terms, Complainant will withdraw a criminal complaint and civil money claim against Accused in return of which Accused will give rights to daughter of Complainant in another civil suit... Now Complainant has expired. Deliberately Accused says that Consent terms ARE BOGUS FRAUDULENT AS CONSENT TERMS NOT STAMPED..
But Complainant and his daughter had complied with their terms as laid down in that document, when that time there were no discussions of stamping registration.
ALL LITIGATIONS WERE WITHDRAWN AGAINST ACCUSED FROM SEVERAL COURTS. DAUGHTER OF COMPLAINANT ACTING AS CONSITUTED ATTORNEY OF COMPLAINANT WITHDREW PERSONALLY LITIGATIONS AGAINST ACCUSED.
Purposefully to resile from consent terms, Accused says that consent terms ARE VOID, BOGUS AND INADMISSIBLE AS EVIDENCE BEFORE ANY COURTS SINCE CONSENT TERMS NOT STAMPED REGISTERED.. REQUEST YOU TO PLEASE GUIDE ME.. AS IM THE VITIM AND DAUGHTER OF COMPLAINANT AND HAVE BEEN HARASSED AS ACCUSED IS VERY POWERFUL THANKYOU
Read more at: http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/modify_message.asp?entry_id=804520