cpc

can any member help me to get head notes



Hi members,
can any member help me to get head notes of the following case law

The Imperial Tobacco Co. of India v. The Registrar of Trade
Marks, AIR 1977 Cal 413

I am unable to retrive from the site of calcutta high court.
 
Reply   
 
Advocate-on-Record Supreme Court of India

Dear Sir,


Please check your citation. I fear its not right. However, from 1970 - 1979, I found following case laws involving Imperial:





















Imperial Chemical Industries Limited vs Commissioner of Wealth Tax, West Bengal Iii [CALCUTTA HIGH COURT]

The Judgment was delivered by DIPAK KUMAR SEN J.DIPAK KUMAR SEN J.This reference is in respect of wealth-tax assessments of the Imperial Chemical Industries, London, the assessee, in the assessment years 1957-58, 1958-59 and 1959-60. The relevant
29 Mar 1979
Imperial Chemical Industries Limited vs Commissioner of Income Tax, West Bengal Iv [CALCUTTA HIGH COURT]

The Judgment was delivered by SABYASACHI MUKHARJI J.SABYASACHI MUKHARJI J.In this reference under s. 256(1) of the I.T. Act, 1961, the following question has been referred to this court "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case,
07 Mar 1978
Imperial Chemical Industries Limited vs Income Tax Officer, 'B' Ward, Companies District Iv, and Others [CALCUTTA HIGH COURT]

The Judgment was delivered by SALIL K ROY CHOWDHURY J. :SALIL K ROY CHOWDHURY J. - The short question involved in this appeal is whether the Income-tax Officer had jurisdiction to issue the notice dated on 20th May, 1970, under section 148 of the
11 Oct 1974
Imperial Tobacco Company of India Limited vs Authority Appointed By The State of West Bengal Under Payment of Wages Act and Others [CALCUTTA HIGH COURT]

The Order of the Court is as followsThis is an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the applicant being the Imperial Tobacco Company of India Ltd., and it concerns as application made under 15 of the Payment of Wages Act,


 


Trust thould suffice


 

 
Reply   
 


Advocate-on-Record Supreme Court of India





























1977 INDLAW CAL 159
[CALCUTTA HIGH COURT]
 







I.T.C. Limited

v

Registrar of Trade Marks and Another


SALIL KUMAR DATTA



14 Jun 1977

 
BENCH

SANKAR PRASAD MITRA C. J, SALIL KUMAR DATTA, JJ & JJ



COMPARATIVE CITATIONS

23 PTC 533, 1977 INDLAW CAL 159



ACTS REFERRED

Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958[s. 9, s. 9(2), s. 9(5), s. 18(6), s. 109(2), s. 109(5), s. 109]

Companies Act, 1956

Trade Marks Act, 1919[s. 2]

Trade Marks (Amendment) Act, 1937

Trade Marks Act, 1940

British Act of 1938 (ENG)[s. 9(3), s. 9(1)(d), s. 9(1)(e), s. 9(1), s. 9(5)(b), s. 10(2), s. 9(2), s. 9(4), s. 9(5), s. 10(1)]



 
CASE NO

A.F.O.O. No. 190 of 1969



 

EDITOR'S NOTE

Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Appeal to challenge order rejecting application for registration of trade marks – Registration was sought for trade mark for label, used as wrapper of packets of cigarettes bearing device of snow clad hills in outline with word 'Simla' – Held, 'Simla' is too prominent a city, capital of Himachal Pradesh, well known in country and abroad and in its ordinary or geographical significance it is inherently neither distinctive nor adapted to distinguish also nor capable of distinguishing goods of appellant as a particular trader from those of others, and is also hit by provisions of Section 9 sub-section (1) C1. (d) of Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 – Appeal dismissed.

 





























1977 INDLAW CAL 159
[CALCUTTA HIGH COURT]
 







I.T.C. Limited

v

Registrar of Trade Marks and Another


SALIL KUMAR DATTA



14 Jun 1977

 
BENCH

SANKAR PRASAD MITRA C. J, SALIL KUMAR DATTA, JJ & JJ



COMPARATIVE CITATIONS

23 PTC 533, 1977 INDLAW CAL 159



ACTS REFERRED

Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958[s. 9, s. 9(2), s. 9(5), s. 18(6), s. 109(2), s. 109(5), s. 109]

Companies Act, 1956

Trade Marks Act, 1919[s. 2]

Trade Marks (Amendment) Act, 1937

Trade Marks Act, 1940

British Act of 1938 (ENG)[s. 9(3), s. 9(1)(d), s. 9(1)(e), s. 9(1), s. 9(5)(b), s. 10(2), s. 9(2), s. 9(4), s. 9(5), s. 10(1)]



 
CASE NO

A.F.O.O. No. 190 of 1969



 

EDITOR'S NOTE

Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Appeal to challenge order rejecting application for registration of trade marks – Registration was sought for trade mark for label, used as wrapper of packets of cigarettes bearing device of snow clad hills in outline with word 'Simla' – Held, 'Simla' is too prominent a city, capital of Himachal Pradesh, well known in country and abroad and in its ordinary or geographical significance it is inherently neither distinctive nor adapted to distinguish also nor capable of distinguishing goods of appellant as a particular trader from those of others, and is also hit by provisions of Section 9 sub-section (1) C1. (d) of Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 – Appeal dismissed.

 



 


 


please find above the requisite headnotes.

 
Reply   
 


Thank you Mr. Majumder for your effort to submit the head notes.


but AIR citation is also a right one any how once again thank you very much.


 

 
Reply   
 
Legal Consultant/Lawyer

DEAR RAMESH,


As per me,  either myself or you little bit on mistake about the Citation and year of Judgment. But, the detail Judgment required by you is herewith attached as Word Doc file.



Attached File : 27 imperial tobacco co. of india ltd. vs the registrar of trade marks.doc downloaded 86 times
 
Reply   
 


Thank you sir

 
Reply   
 

LEAVE A REPLY


    

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  



 

  Search Forum








×

Menu

IPC Grand Course     |    x