The complainant gave a document to MM's court, based on which MM cancelled the bail application of the accused under section 406. Later in a writ at the High Court, the complainant mentions in the reply that he does not know the origin of the said doccument which he produced in the lower court. The writ was later withdrawn.
1. Is the complainant guilty of perjury, as he submitted a document whose origin he did not know, hence a document whose origin is not known and not seized by the Police, could be termed as a false document, hence direct assault on court ?.
2. Is the IO also responsible in informing the MM that the authenticity of the document submitted is not known to him.
3.If a case can be made, what it would be, if any expert would like to take up this case to logical conclusion?
