Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

498a prima facie evidence to arrest !

Page no : 2

Sudhir Kumar, Advocate (Advocate)     19 August 2014

Not able to read what is there in Hindi probably my computer could not read the font.

 

Basically the complainant in disciplinary proceedings has no say in the outocme of the proceedings.

 

Still Appellate Authority of the accused govt employee can be approached with request to re-open the case

498 A fighter (Advocate)     19 August 2014

from my last post some text is not readable so i am reposting it in new font--

@Sudhir Kumar

sir departmental enqury means when I filed RTI to Polic head Quarter and gave some application that she did wrong in my case then police go to investigate my allegation aginst her and it is done by additional SP final report was given to SP in that it is mentioned by him with date and his signature that i am pasting there version as mentioned in their report as follows"

     ^^vfrfjDr iqfyl v/kh{kd egksn;]}kjk rRlaca/k esa ,d foLr`r tkWap dk;Zokgh dh xbZ]ftlesa esjs vykok mifujh{kd Jherh lkfjdk o vkj{kd xtsUnz feJk ds rRlaca/k esa dFku ys[kc) fd;s x;s rFkk laiw.kZ tkWpksijkar Jheku vfrfjDr iqfyl v/kh{kd egksn;]bUnkSj ¼e-iz-½ }kjk ;g ik;k x;k fd %

 

                   ^^ ekuuh; ftyk U;k;k/kh”k egksn; bUnkSj ds U;k;ky; esa fgUnq fookg vf/kfu;e /kkjk&09 ds varxZr nkEiR; laca/k iquZLFkkiuk gsrq ;kfpdk vuhy frokjh }kjk fnukad 27-7-10 dks izLrqr dh x;h Fkh rks fnukad 25-8-10 dk rRdky vuhy dh iRuh dh fjiksVZ ij vijk/k dk;e ugha djuk Fkk u gh rRdky fxj¶rkjh dh tkuh Pkkfg, Fkh]rFkk vuhy ds ;gkW ryk”kh ds nkSjku lh-vkj-ih-lh- dh izfØz;kRed mica/kksa dk ikyu Hkh ugha fd;k x;kA Fkkuk dksrokyh rFkk mifujh{kd Jherh lkfjdk us jokuxh@okilh Hkh izLrqr ugha dh gS tks izHkkjh ifjokj ijke”kZ dsUnz lkfjdk dh Hkwfedk dks rFkk dk;Zokgh izfdz;k dks lansgkLin cukrh gSA blh dkj.k vukosnd dks ckj&ckj f”kdk;r dk volj feykA

          vr%,o ifjokj ijke”kZ dsUnz izHkkjh us f”kdk;r fujkd`r fd, fcuk tYnckth esa dk;Zokgh dh gS tks fd mfpr izfrr ugha gksrh gSA

          vr% Jherh lkfjdk izHkkjh ijke”kZ dsUnz bUnkSj ds fo#} leqfpr n.MkRed dk;Zokgh vuqla”kk dh tkrh gS A

          pwafd izdj.k ekuuh; U;k;ky; esa fopkjk/khu gS vr% izdj.k ds xq.k&nks’k ij fopkj djuk fu;ekuqlkj mfpr ugh gS A **

blds ckn mudh lh vkj iqfLrdk esa orZeku ,l-ih egksn; us fuEu dk;Zokgh dh oks ,Slh gS--


^^lh0vkj0ih0lh0 ds izfd;kRed micU/kks dk ikyu ughaa djus o ykijokgh cjrus dk nks"kh ikrs gq;s mifujh{kd lkfjdk dsk lsok iqfLrdk esa fuUnk ds n.M ls nf.Mr fd;k tkrk gSA** 

Now my question was this that IO got very lite punishment i am suffering from last five years.....? why when she found guildy then why case was not closed,,?

Please guide me over here, yes definitely it will help me in cross examination but it come after two three year till then i have to suffer and move round the court....


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register