25% OFF on all LCI Courses. Offer valid till 5th Oct. Use Code: DUS25
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

340 crpc case, a counter case on 125 crpc case

Page no : 2

Prabodh Shukla (Advocate )     23 January 2012

340 will be decided first ... its is not a general aaplication , it is a information application to the court that a crime had ben committed agisnt you

 

Regards Prabodh Shukla

9540274333

Praveen Jain (Advocate)     23 January 2012

Hello everyone, The no was not given in the case quoted herewith, also the year is wrong. I made a search in the court record and finally I found it. The no and year on official web site are us under:- 

 

Case Status - Lucknow Bench

 

Disposed on 09/01/2003

Misc. Single : 56 of 2003 [Lucknow]

Petitioner:

SYD NAZIM HUSAIN

Respondent:

ADDL. PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, LUCKNOW & ANR.

Counsel (Pet.):

MOHD. KHALID

Counsel (Res.):

GOVT. ADVOCATE

Category:

Criminal Writs Maintenance U/s 125, Cr.p.c.-Miscellaneous

Date of Filing:

07/01/2003

Last Listed on:

 
 

 

This is not an authentic/certified copy of the information regarding status of a case. Authentic/certified information may be obtained under Chapter VIII Rule 30 of Allahabad High Court Rules. Mistake, if any, may be brought to the notice of OSD (Computer).

Praveen Jain
Advocate
Mobile:09412102942, 09319771376
 

1 Like

Praveen Jain (Advocate)     23 January 2012

You may Qupte as under:-

Rajat ...........Complainant / Respondent

vs

Gauri........Respondent /Petitioner

 

2.

  Rajat Wouldsign the 340 Application as Complainant / Respondent.

 

Praveen Jain
Advocate
Mobile:09412102942, 09319771376
 


 

Praveen Jain (Advocate)     23 January 2012

Sorry, Some mistake, Correct are us under:-

You may Quote as under:-

Rajat ...........Complainant

vs

Gauri........Respondent

 

2.

Rajat Would sign the 340 Application as Complainant.

 

Praveen Jain
Advocate
Mobile:09412102942, 09319771376

Shonee Kapoor (Legal Evangelist - TRIPAKSHA)     26 January 2012

The application would be filed by the complainant and an affidavit would need to be annexed with it.

 


Regards,
 
Shonee Kapoor
harassed.by.498a@gmail.com
1 Like

KNK A Learner (Learning to share)     24 February 2012

The petitioner is liable for prosecution if filed a petition containing false averments without entering into the witnessbox.

Order 6 Rule 15 of the Code of Civil Procedure reads as under:
Rule 15. Verification of pleadings. –

(1) Save as otherwise provided by any law for the time being in force, every pleading shall be verified at the foot by the party or by one of the parties pleading or by some other person proved to the satisfaction of the Court to be acquainted with the facts of the case.

(2) The person verifying shall specify, by reference to the numbered paragraphs of the pleading, what he verifies of his own knowledge and what he verifies upon information received and believed to be true.

(3) The verification shall be signed by the person making it and shall state the date on which and the place at which it was signed.

(4) The person verifying the pleading shall also furnish an affidavit in support of his pleadings.

And Also

Section 282 of the Indian Succession Act [39 of 1925] reads as - If any petition or declaration which is hereby required to be verified contains any averment which the person making the verification knows or believes to be false, such person shall be deemed to have committed an offence under Section 193 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (45 of 1860)

So, No need to wait till the end of trail. Perjury can file any time, its the courts discretion to proceed or not

Thanks,

KNK

dream (individual)     19 February 2013

dear harish, whats the update on this mattter from your end buddy. Regards

Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  



Post a Suggestion for LCI Team
Post a Legal Query