he court held that there must be a consequential levy of a fine of an amount sufficient to cheque amount and interest thereon at a fixed rate of 9% p.a, followed by the award of such sum as compensation from the fine amount and the appeal was dismiss..
The court held that the accused booked under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act would ordinarily be granted bail since the offence was a non-bailable one and therefore they are not to be taken in the custody during the trial. Likewise, a person..
The court opined that there was no dispute in the agreement of sale and ordered for handing over of vehicle to the petitioner on receiving the security of Rs 1,00,000...
The case introduces Contributory Negligence from the base level, which simply states that negligence/ignorance/carelessness matters even if you are injured too. It wipes out the fact that carelessness of only single party matters, and empowers people..
The court held that the petitioner was to be awarded 'default bail' based on the facts and the circumstances of the case and set aside the order of the High Court...
The approach adopted by the Supreme Court of India is commendable. The apex court has established that the judiciary is independent and dedicated to protecting the rights of the last citizen of the country...
The Court set aside the impugned order of High Court and allowed the appellants to remain on bail pursuant to the bond already executed by them...
The background to the petition filed lies in the events that the petitioner was arrested in connection with the offence punishable under Sections 386, 506 and 120-B of the IPC...
The Court allowed the appeal and set aside the decision of the High Court affirming that of the Sessions Court convicting and sentencing the respondents...
The petition was allowed and the petitioner was released as sought by the advocate...
The Court dismissed the appeal against the order of the Kerala High Courtfor grant of bail to the respondent...
A Bombay High Court division bench consisting of Chief Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice G.S.Kulkarni has declared through the judgment in the case – National Association of Blind v. Bombay Municipal Corporation, delivered on October 28, 2020, that ..
In the judgment of the case – Jayantilal Verma v. State of M.P. (Now Chhattisgarh), delivered on November 19, 2020, Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Justice Hrishikesh Roy, at the Supreme Court, have ruled that in the case of death of wife Sahodarabai ..
With the judgment by Justice A.M. Badar, at Kerala High Court delivered on November 2, 2020 in the case – Authorized Officer, Indian Bank v. K.J. George & Others, the Supreme Court’s clear view has been reiterated that in the absence of a statutory p..
The judgment deals with a writ petition filed by Journalist Amish Devgan seeking quashing of FIRs lodged against him for his remarks against Sufi Saint Moinnuddin Chisthi. The question before the court was that whether the First Information Reports s..
The judgement after these many years of hard work and struggle seems welcoming by the majority population in the country. This judgement upheld the right of women to have PC in the Army thereby making them stand shoulder to shoulder with their male c..
In the SC's view, the reasons recorded in the orders passed by the Trial Court, as confirmed in revision and by the HC are valid and are in accordance with the settled principles of law. It is clear from the conduct of the appellants, that in spite o..
While noting that in most of the medico-legal cases, the sentence in most of the medico-legal cases, the outcome of the criminal case depends upon the findings in the autopsy certificate and also the doctor's evidence, the Madras High Court in a late..
The present case is a cornerstone in cases at the intersection of criminal law and constitutional rights since it is among the first cases filed to deal with the silencing of the dissent under the current NDA regime. It deals with the arrest of five ..
In an interesting, fresh and significant development, the Supreme Court in a latest, landmark and laudable judgment titled Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal vs. State of Uttarakhand in Civil Appeal No. 3493/2020 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 10943/2020) along ..
Member Strength 9,49,804 and growing..
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
