Quashing of criminal proceedings - Illegal transportation of black Jaggery and Alum - Case registered under Sections 34(e), 41 and 42 of the Andhra Pradesh Excise Act, 1968 - Impugned finding of High Court quashing the proceedings under challenge ..
Recruitment Rules for the post of Drivers in Delhi Administration - Regular Appointment - Direction of Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) to consider regular appointment as per law subject to availability of regular vacancies and without insisti..
Pearlite Liners Ltd. vs Thermo Jarrell Ash Corporation And Anr..
State Legal Service Authority..
Criminal cases are decided on facts and evidence rather than on case law and precedents ..
Jai Industries vs N. Babhraiah Acharya And Ors..
Pearlite Liners Ltd. vs Thermo Jarrell Ash Corporation And Anr..
Karnataka Power Transmission Corpn Vs Ashok Iron Works Pvt. Ltd Section 2(1) in The Registration Act, 1908 Section 2(1) in The Companies Act, 1956 Section 2(1)(o) in The Consumer Protection Act, 1986 Section 3 in The Registration Act, 1908 S..
Karnataka Power Transmission Corpn Vs Ashok Iron Works Pvt. Ltd Section 2(1) in The Registration Act, 1908 Section 2(1) in The Companies Act, 1956 Section 2(1)(o) in The Consumer Protection Act, 1986 Section 3 in The Registration Act, 1908 S..
Appointment of High Court Judge under article 217 of the Constitution of India...
Brief facts which are necessary to dispose of the matter are recapitulated as under: The appellant was enrolled in the Territorial Army on 28.9.1975 as a Sepoy. At the time of joining service the appellant was put through the medical test and was fo..
Under the web of hypertechnicalities justice has taken a back seat as is projected in the order dated 22.11.2006, passed by Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Girgaum, Mumbai in Crl. Case No. 38/S/2005 filed by appellant herein against accused..
The parties were married on May 8, 1995. The respondent-husband petitioned for divorce under Section 13 (1) (ia) and (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short, `the Act’) on the ground of cruelty and desertion against the wife. The Principal Ju..
Appellant Mohd. Ayub Dar S/o Abdul Ahad – Original accused no.1 challenges his conviction for the offence punishable under Section 3 (3) of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (In short “TADA ACT”), as also for the offence ..
The Maharshi Dayanand University (hereinafter referred to as “the appellant”) has questioned the correctness of the order in Revision Petition No.132/06 passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi (hereinafter called “Nat..
“On the 26th of January 1950, India would be a democratic country in the sense that India from that day would have a government of the people, by the people and for the people. The same thought comes to my mind. What would happen to her democratic Co..
Member Strength 9,49,658 and growing..
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
