Should the power excercised by the Governer under Article 161 regarding clemency be kept open for judicial review? |
|
| Yes | 71 % |
 |
|
| No | 24 % |
|
|
|
| Can't say | 5 % |
|
|
|
| Total Votes Cast : 41 | |
| Submitted By - sanjeev kumar jaiswal | Read Comments |
| Posted by Isaac Gabriel |
28/04/2013 16:00:51 |
| B'cause,Governer is having no discretion on his own, rather to abide by the advise of the Governemnt,which could be influenced by the politicalweight.As such the intention of the justice delivery system may be given a go-bye. | |
| Posted by Somnath Gangopadhyay |
19/04/2013 20:43:41 |
| The basis for judicial review should be several namely period spent in prison, nature of crime, age as well as demeanor of the convict in prison and of course the social impact. | |
| Posted by Somnath Gangopadhyay |
19/04/2013 20:43:41 |
| The basis for judicial review should be several namely period spent in prison, nature of crime, age as well as demeanor of the convict in prison and of course the social impact. | |
| Posted by Member (Account Deleted) |
19/04/2013 19:08:03 |
| Not at all.The purpose of the provision will be defeated if judicial review is allowed in clemency cases.Clemency is granted only when the Highest court has pronounced it's judgement.Again re-inventing the wheel will be a non-sense act. | |
| Posted by advocate praveen |
19/04/2013 16:21:41 |
| definitely, it is happen in our judiciary if trial court commit/leave any flaw in the judgement than higher court has to review the same. In this case it must be open judicial review. | |
| Posted by R.K Nanda |
19/04/2013 10:44:56 |
| YES.MUST BE KEPT OPEN FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW. R.K.NANDA-ADV-SUPREME COURT OF INDIA | |
Member Strength 9,47,829 and growing..
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
