Do you welcome the Right to Education Act mandating 25 % free seats to poor students in private schools? |
|
| Yes | 82 % |
 |
|
| No | 17 % |
|
|
|
| Cant Say | 1 % |
|
|
|
| Total Votes Cast : 157 | |
| Submitted By - Prakash Yedhula | Read Comments |
| Posted by Sankaranarayanan |
30/04/2012 12:56:57 |
| good decision | |
| Posted by Irtiza Mushtaq |
30/04/2012 04:43:49 |
| yes, its our moral duty to help and support the poor as pertaining their basic needs and education........ and the same comment lies for sc&st.... but no reservation must be there for them as regarding jobs........ coz they study in the same edu. instt. as we do..... | |
| Posted by jagadish hiremath |
29/04/2012 18:59:10 |
| It would be better if minority institutions brought along with private schools. | |
| Posted by Member (Account Deleted) |
28/04/2012 13:08:49 |
| yes. | |
| Posted by VARUN MAHAJAN |
27/04/2012 23:33:09 |
| education is available in other institutes also | |
| Posted by MohammedRaffiq Bijapur |
27/04/2012 22:42:45 |
| It is welcome move of the parliament. the private education institutes have closed the poor talented students upliftment | |
| Posted by Sankaranarayanan |
27/04/2012 15:00:54 |
| good policy | |
| Posted by Manoj Yadav |
27/04/2012 10:29:46 |
| ` | |
| Posted by pradip shah |
27/04/2012 07:12:50 |
| there will increase in school fees | |
| Posted by Anish Thakur 7018812737 |
27/04/2012 00:30:30 |
| why reservin seats in private schools? govt should improve the infrastructure of there own schools, govt have best qualified teachers who gt success in the exam before posting and rest candidates join private schools . so there is something wrong in education policy of govt,govt should take advise from educationist not from there under metric ministers. | |
| Posted by shailesh bordawekar |
25/04/2012 10:06:36 |
| Any ACT without sanction is never compel to follow, And same the case with this Act which doesn't attract any penalty. | |
| Posted by SAGAR |
25/04/2012 10:05:43 |
| Very good step by Govt. | |
| Posted by M.Sheik Mohammed Ali |
24/04/2012 17:04:02 |
| no doubt, all the state must keep and follow the order. | |
| Posted by C. P. CHUGH |
22/04/2012 21:33:29 |
| A good beginning, due since long. | |
| Posted by NANDA KUMAR M |
21/04/2012 23:30:03 |
| I WHOLE HEARTLY WELCOME. A POSITIVE MOVE FOR THE PEOPLE.IT SHOULD BE IN ALL SCHOOLS WITH ALL AMENETIES AS LIKE THE OTHER WARDS WITHOUT ANY DISCRIMINATION. IN NEAR FUTURE IT SHOULD BE FREE SEATS TO ALL.THEN REALLY WE WILL GROW CROSSING INDIFFERENCES TO A KNOWLEDGE BASED COUNTRY. | |
| Posted by Sajid |
19/04/2012 17:19:10 |
| Ofcourse it is a good idea.But, Poor students can not get the accessories like uniform, electronic gadgets, and many more, as the rich people. So, they will be depressed. So, they can not give concentration in studies. | |
| Posted by Om Prakash Shakya |
19/04/2012 12:25:29 |
| 25% free seas to poor students in private shcools should be given who are till now deprived of this opportunity. | |
| Posted by Kirti Kar Tripathi |
18/04/2012 15:36:38 |
| YES, BUT IS THERE ANY PROVISION TO DILUTE THE FINANCIAL LOSS TO BE SUFFERED BY THE INSTITUTION ON ACCOUNT OF IMPLEMENTATION OF ACT OTHERWISE, THE INSTITUTION WILL HIKE THE FEE AND ULTIMATELY COMMON MEN HAS TO BEAR THE SAME. | |
| Posted by Shankar Mahadevan |
18/04/2012 13:43:17 |
| YES MUST | |
| Posted by Dhingra P.S. |
16/04/2012 12:25:24 |
| Of course, the Act should have been right from the independence of India. The Government has opened its eyes after about 65 years of independence towards this issue. Anyway, it is OK if even now. | |
| Posted by R.K Nanda |
15/04/2012 14:00:31 |
| Yes. | |
| Posted by VENKATESH HEGDE |
14/04/2012 12:01:49 |
| If it is Poor Student belongs to all communities, i welcome. | |
| Posted by sureshkumar g r |
13/04/2012 13:03:52 |
| undoubtedly yes,even the percentage should be 50% to poor students in private schools. | |
| Posted by M.Sheik Mohammed Ali |
13/04/2012 11:08:17 |
| no doubt, | |
Member Strength 9,47,934 and growing..
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
