Do you think the Allahabad High Court exceeded its jurisdiction in dividing the disputed land in three parts? |
|
| Yes | 50 % |
 |
|
| No | 49 % |
|
|
|
| Can't Say | 1 % |
|
|
|
| _ | 0 % |
 |
|
| Total Votes Cast : 192 | |
| Submitted By - Prakash Yedhula | Read Comments |
| Posted by prashant |
21/10/2010 18:21:30 |
| We are secular state...every part of the earth can be used by any person for worshiping God whether Hindus or Muslims.But the fact Hindus preexistent to Muslims or Islam can not be ignored. | |
| Posted by Member (Account Deleted) |
19/10/2010 21:46:46 |
| Metter is sub - Judice no comment.Expression of view is always one sided in the abscence of facts and evidenc. N.C.Dubey | |
| Posted by O. Mahalakshmi |
19/10/2010 16:34:04 |
| good question framed | |
| Posted by PRASANNA KUMAR H |
18/10/2010 17:07:37 |
| Stop the dividing policy already once we made a mistake..... | |
| Posted by GIRISH AGRAWAL |
18/10/2010 00:37:38 |
| YES :- SOCIAL POINT OF VIEW NO :- LEGAL POINT OF VIEW | |
| Posted by J K Agrawal |
17/10/2010 08:18:15 |
| The High Court has enough power to do so. | |
| Posted by Member (Account Deleted) |
16/10/2010 19:26:31 |
| High Court agree to the fact that a Maszid was made on the temple.The court verdict just confer for mutual agreement and to appease all section of people. | |
| Posted by Dr D.K.V.Gangatharan |
16/10/2010 18:25:43 |
| The Allahabad High Court exceeded its jurisdiction in dividing the disputed land in three parts | |
| Posted by P N V Krishnan |
16/10/2010 06:55:05 |
| I think this judgement has introduced a new element FAITH. I feel in a modern scientific society the so called faith should have no place in Jurisprudence. | |
| Posted by niranjan |
13/10/2010 13:27:00 |
| I do not think that justice should only be given based on law books and only interpreting the law,the judges have inherent power to mould relief in the given circumstances. The Court might have exceeded the jurisdiction and given relief not within four corners of the suit,but exigencies demanded the present verdict. | |
| Posted by faizul gaffar.shaik |
13/10/2010 12:17:38 |
| Prpoperty should be given to one party. i cant distribute. if it so, in future it may lead further legal obligations. instead of distributing it could have suggested the govt . | |
| Posted by Sanjay Kumar Singh |
12/10/2010 22:08:08 |
| . | |
| Posted by sudheer kumar sahoo |
11/10/2010 15:21:19 |
| yes the Hon'ble High Court exceeded it jurisdiction in dividing the disputed land in three parts, it seems like a compromise by the Hon'ble court. | |
| Posted by Arati Gawde |
10/10/2010 21:31:30 |
| . | |
| Posted by Sathyan A.R. |
09/10/2010 23:57:52 |
| the concept applied is that of partition of HUF property where co parceners are entitled to equal divison mutadis mutandis | |
| Posted by BALAGANESH NADAR |
09/10/2010 18:20:21 |
| IF YOU ARE LIVING IN RENTAL HOME? FILE CASE AGAINST YOUR HOUSE OWNER IN ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT. THE COURT WILL PROVIDE 1/2 PART OF THE HOME TO YOU! BEST OF LUCK! JAI SHRI RAM! B.BALAGANESH, KANYAKUMARI CELL:09442947852 | |
| Posted by Rakesh Bharti |
09/10/2010 15:55:17 |
| all the three judges have made it clear that the masjid was built on a structure of Hindu temple.as such, there was no justification in dividing the land in three parts. | |
| Posted by Democratic Indian |
08/10/2010 19:01:39 |
| Courts have been created to uphold the law of the land and Constitution. Their job is not to get influenced by prevailing political scenarios etc. otherwise people will loose faith in judiciary, if they start giving judgments to "please all" concerned parties. | |
| Posted by Kirti Kar Tripathi |
08/10/2010 08:01:24 |
| because, the suits pertain to the title of the property, which were required to be decided on the basis of the issues framed in the suits. No issue regarding partition was framed in any of the suit. | |
| Posted by Sanjay Kumar Singh |
06/10/2010 23:31:30 |
| . | |
| Posted by Parthasarathi Loganathan |
06/10/2010 19:00:53 |
| Every citizen in this country must understand the fact the verdict has open doors to not only satisfying the religious sentiments but also considering the sensitivity of the case and its outcome, HC has done a commendable job in creating a judicial precedent as to exceed its administrative jurisdiction. | |
| Posted by pawan sharma |
06/10/2010 14:48:00 |
| yes the Hon"ble H C exceeded its jurisdiction in dividing the disputed land in three parts bcz the suit No.5 was dismissed,even that gave the 1/3 land. | |
| Posted by Bhartiya No. 1 |
06/10/2010 01:20:38 |
| It is something like outcome of partition suit or "Panchayati" type judgment. Where Hon. HC has tried to appease all the party. | |
Member Strength 9,48,291 and growing..
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
