due to the personal srtain relationship
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Sections 2(s) and 25F - Award - Non application of mind - Termination - Daily wager-muster roll employee - Reinstatement directed for violation of section 25F of the Act - Appellant specifically pleaded that it is part
Under Section 9 of Code of Civil Procedure Code whether the Civil Court has jurisdiction in the Labour disputes. Overlapping jurisdiction of two Courts in service matters. Held- when a right accrues under two statutes vis-à-vis the common law right,
Relationship of Employer employee relationship ceases to exist after retirement.So the employer cannot initiate any disciplinary action after retirement.
The Supreme Court by affirming the order of Allahabad High Court held that when persons are discharging same functions and duties there is no reason to refuse some benefits to some of them and treat them differently. The Government of India granted v
Thus, the Corporation cannot put forth financial loss as a ground only with regard to a limited category of employees. It cannot be said that the Corporation is financially sound insofar granting of revised pay scales to other employees, but finds fi
The very fact is that the disciplinary committee who found the respondent(herein) guilty participated in decision making process for finding the respondent(herein) guilty and to dismiss him from service is bias which is apparent & real.
Encashing the earned leave is not a part of "basic wage" under Section 2(b) of the Employees' Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (in short the 'Act') requiring pro rata employer's contribution