Which DHARNA is ROOT CAUSE OF CASTE DISCRIMINATION

Shriman Ram samudre ji, main gussa bilkul nahi kar raha hun aur aapke is aakhir wale statement se bhi puri tarah sahmat hu aur mere khayal se isse koi bhi asahmat nahi hoga. sabhi yahi kahte hai jo aap kah rahe hai. Fir vaham ya bhavnaatmak duri kis baat pe ho gayi? Har vyavastha men der saber kuchh chhudra swarthi tatha arajak tatva aa hi jaate hain. sirf unke aadhaar par puri vyavastha ko anyaayi kahna bewkufi hai. kis pandit ne kah diya ki hindu dharm chhuwachhut wala dharm hai? Kya aaj chhuwachhut nahin hai aur kya swasthya ki dristi se kuchh maamle men chhuwachhut jaruri nahin hai? kya sever ki safaayi kar rahe majdoor se aap gale lag jaate hain? aur jab tak vo thik se snaan na kar le tab tak kya  uske gale lag jana sadharan logo ke sehat ke liye thik hai?

Kya buddha ne ved aur Ram Krishna ko bina shart gaali dena  sikhaya tha? Kya Buddha kshatriya nahin the?

Buddh ki aisi kaun si sikh hai jo Hindu sabhyata men pahle se maujood nahin thi? Ram aur Krishn ne kaun aisi baat kahi jo hindu sabhyata men pahle se nahin thi? Har kisi mahapurus ne chhupe huye vicharon ko shabdon ka her fer karke apne jamaane ke lihaj se aur aane wale jamane ka aakalan karne bhavishya ke liye jo upyukt samjha us tarike se samjhaya. Ek hi baat ko sabhi ne apne-apne audience ko thik se samjhane ke liye alag - alag tarike se samjhaya.

Ram, Krisn, Manu, Vyaas , Buddh, Isa Masih, Sai baba, Paigambar muhammad,....,... kisi ne koi alag baat nahi kahi.

Filhal, kisi ne thik kaha hai ki - "Religion ek deerghkaalik rajniti hai".

Shriman ji main gussa bilkul nahi kar raha hun aur aapke is aakhir wale statement se bhi puri tarah sahmat hu aur mere khayal se isse koi bhi asahmat nahi hoga. sabhi yahi kahte hai jo aap kah rahe hai. Fir vaham ya bhavnaatmak duri kis baat pe ho gayi? Har vyavastha men der saber kuchh chhudra swarthi tatha arajak tatva aa hi jaate hain. sirf unke aadhaar par puri vyavastha ko anyaayi kahna bewkufi hai. kis pandit ne kah diya ki hindu dharm chhuwachhut wala dharm hai? Kya aaj chhuwachhut nahin hai aur kya swasthya ki dristi se kuchh maamle men chhuwachhut jaruri nahin hai? kya sever ki safaayi kar rahe majdoor se aap gale lag jaate hain? aur jab tak vo thik se snaan na kar le tab tak kya  uske gale lag jana sadharan logo ke sehat ke liye thik hai?

Kya buddha ne ved aur Ram Krishna ko bina shart gaali dena  sikhaya tha? Kya Buddha kshatriya nahin the?

Buddh ki aisi kaun si sikh hai jo Hindu sabhyata men pahle se maujood nahin thi? Ram aur Krishn ne kaun aisi baat kahi jo hindu sabhyata men pahle se nahin thi? Har kisi mahapurus ne chhupe huye vicharon ko shabdon ka her fer karke apne jamaane ke lihaj se aur aane wale jamane ka aakalan karne bhavishya ke liye jo upyukt samjha us tarike se samjhaya. Ek hi baat ko sabhi ne apne-apne audience ko thik se samjhane ke liye alag - alag tarike se samjhaya.

Ram, Krisn, Manu, Vyaas , Buddh, Isa Masih, Sai baba, Paigambar muhammad,....,... kisi ne koi alag baat nahi kahi.

Filhal, kisi ne thik kaha hai ki - "Religion ek deergh kaalik rajniti hai".

Buddh ki aisi kaun si seekh hai jo Hindu sabhyata men pahle se maujood nahin thi? Ram aur Krishn ne kaun aisi baat kahi jo hindu sabhyata men pahle se nahin thi? Har kisi mahapurus ne chhupe huye vicharon ko shabdon ka her fer karke apne jamaane ke lihaj se aur aane wale jamane ka aakalan karke bhavishya ke liye jo upyukt samjha us tarike se samjhaya. Ek hi baat ko sabhi ne apne-apne audience ko thik se samjhane ke liye alag - alag tarike se samjhaya.

Ram, Krisn, Manu, Vyaas , Buddh, Isa Masih, Naanak, Sai baba, Paigambar muhammad,....,... kisi ne koi alag baat nahi kahi.

Filhal, kisi rajneta (Shayad Lohiyaji) ne thik kaha  ki - "Religion ek deergh kaalik rajniti hai".

Bandhu, yahi to hamaara great constitution hai ki everyone is free to have own thoughts which may not be harmful to others. So we are having equal freedom of expression and which one is considered by the majority is acceptable at national level. I have mentioned my threads in which this topic is discussed several times and the process of discussion will be and should be continued to sort out the best and this is called progress and I think everyone like progress. So please left the bad things behind and come forward and now we are "ONE" as a "Indian Citizen with equal rights" so we should come together below our national flag the lovable "TIRANGA" and we should keep up the values of our "Ashok Chakra" and we respect our democratic constitution. WELCOME ALL THE INDIAN CITIZEN BROTHERS-SISTERS TO FOLLOW OUR NATIONAL RELIGION - THE BHARTIYA RELIGION OF EQUAL CITIZENSHIP SYSTEM". 

I repeatedly request everyone to please go through my thread;

https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/forum/WHO-IS-CORRUPT-Why-naxalism-terrism-unemployment-poverty--28222.asp

Who is denying equal citizenship?

In what time - present, furture or past the system would be absolutely free from selfish persons who tend  to misuse the system, howsoever best it may be?

Are baklol mera kaha maan - apna sara gyaan aur reaction bhulkar mere Guruji ki sharan me aa ja, tera sara bhram dur ho jayega - tu 'Buddh' aur "Buddham sharnam" ka sahi arth samajh jaayega.

We are comfortable under TIRANGA WITH ASHOK CHAKRA.

Who is uncomfortable? what is your apprehension? For what are you worrying? Is anybody snaching tiranga from you?

Mr Bihari seems to me one of the many indoctrinated cloudes visioned Manuwadi Manhoos whose logic is akin to chhit bhi meri pat bhi meri. Lord Ram was a Kshtriya King . Lord Buddha was also a Kshtriya King. Both of them supposedly had blue blood. We are talking of people who had red blood and still has red blood. We are talking of democracy where majority decides the rule of the game .Unfortunately 5000 years of RAM Rajya and 200 years of colonial rule have dealt a fatal blow to the majority due to feudal structure .They are now organised. It is those people who are still trying to deprieve the majority  needed to be severely punished.It is not very far when majority, the sudras rule this country forever.