Dear Sir
I think I was not able to explain my point. The thing is like that - one BC (tailoring class) girl marries to a boy who is having a domicile of himachal but belongs to a tailoring class (this caste is SC in himachal). After marriage, she also becomes a resident of himachal. My point is that if her caste comes under SC in himachal, why cant she be treated as SC because after marriage her caste is not going to be changed. Only caste's status is changing. You see, if Supreme Court says that if A caste is a SC in one state and one person from A caste starts living in another state where his caste comes under BC, he will be treated as BC and not SC in the other state. Similarly, why a person from B caste which comes under BC in one state, if starts living in another state where his caste comes under SC, why he cannot be given the status of SC. It is as simple as that. If you can snatch his status for not giving him caste benefit, why cant he be given benefit in other state where his caste is treated as lower caste. Now kindly guide.
If you think proper kindly also read
1. Supreme Court of India (FILE ATTACHED)
Bench: B Kumar, A Kumar
CASE NO.:
Appeal (civil) 4684 of 2001
PETITIONER:
Chandigarh Administration and Anr.
RESPONDENT:
Surinder Kumar and Ors.
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 27/11/2003; and
2. State of Uttarachal v. Sandeep Kumar Singh 2010(12) SCC 794, Civil Appeal 4494 of 2006 decided on 7.10.2010
Thanks]
Ajit Singh Randhawa
9988004782