Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

kumar (Freelancer)     01 February 2013

Marriage nullification for psoriasis

Need information on Marriage Nullifying for having Psoriasis.

Can a Marriage be Nullified if the Girl has Psoriasis and she cheated by not disclosing the details before marriage and the Family too has a history of Psoriasis Disease.


If it can be nullified can someone give more information or cases or judgement information who got divorce or marriage nullified on the basis of Psoriasis.

 

It would be really helpful if soneone can provide any information related to the above scenaro.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Learning

 5 Replies

stanley (Freedom)     01 February 2013

Marriage cannot be nullified for the fact the girl has Posarasis ..Google the grounds for Divorce and you will get the conditions or the grounds  where a marriage can be anulled .


(Guest)
If they had not said about this to you it may come under fraud but it is very hard to prove in the court.

kumar (Freelancer)     02 February 2013

It is a genetic disease and passes through generations.

kumar (Freelancer)     02 February 2013

As per my knowledge nullyfying a marriage and divorce are two different things.

Nadeem Qureshi (Advocate/ nadeemqureshi1@gmail.com)     02 February 2013

Dear Querist

if you are a hindu and this query is also related to Hindus, 

11. Void marriages.-

 

Any marriage solemnised after the commencement of this Act shall be null and void and may, on a petition presented by either party thereto 1[against the other party], be so declared by a decree of nullity if it contravenes any one of the conditions specified in clauses (i), (iv) and (v) of section 5.

 

Comments

 

Injunction restraining the other from performing bigamous marriages

 

There is no provision in the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 under which a wife, apprehending her husband's taking second wife, can apply for and obtain an injunction restraining him from doing so. She cannot do so under section 11 or 17 or any other provision of the Act; Umashanker v. Radhadevi , AIR 1967 Pat 220.

 

 

12. Voidable marriages.-

 

(1) Any marriage solemnized, whether before or after the commencement of this Act, shall be voidable and may be annulled by a decree of nullity on any of the following grounds, namely:-

 

(a) that the respondent was impotent at the time of the marriage and continued to be so until the institution of the proceedings; or

 

(b) that the marriage is in contravention of the condition specified in clause (ii) of section 5; or

 

(c) that the consent of the petitioner, or where the consent of the guardian in marriage of the petitioner is required under section 5, the consent of such guardian was obtained by force or fraud; or

 

(d) that the respondent was at the time of the marriage pregnant by some person other than the petitioner.

 

(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), no petition for annulling a marriage-

 

(a) on the ground specified in clause (c) of sub-section (1) shall be entertained if-

 

(i) the petition is presented more than one year after for force had ceased to operate or, as the case may be, the fraud had been discovered; or

 

(ii) the petitioner has, with his or her full consent, lived with the other party to the marriage as husband or wife after the force had ceased to operate or, as the case may be, the fraud had been discovered;

 

(b) on the ground specified in clause (d) of sub-section (1) shall be entertained unless the court is satisfied-

 

(i) that the petitioner was at the time of the marriage ignorant of the facts alleged;

 

(ii) that proceedings have been instituted in the case of a marriage solemnized before the commencement of this Act within one year of such commencement and in the case of marriages solemnized after such commencement within one year from the date of the marriage; and

 

(iii) that marital intercourse with the consent of the petitioner has not taken place since the discovery by the petitioner of the existence of the grounds for a decree.

 

 

5. Conditions for a Hindu marriage.-

 

A marriage may be solemnized between any two Hindus, if the following conditions are fulfilled, namely:—

 

(i) neither party has a spouse living at the time of the marriage;

 

1[(ii) at the time of the marriage, neither party—

 

(a) is incapable of giving a valid consent to it in consequence of unsoundness of mind; or

 

(b) though capable of giving a valid consent, has been suffering from mental disorder of such a kind or to such an extent as to be unfit for marriage and the procreation of children; or

 

(c) has been subject to recurrent attacks of insanity 2[***];]

 

(iii) the bridegroom has completed the age of 3[twenty-one years] and the bride, the age of 4[eighteen years] at the time of the marriage;

 

(iv) the parties are not within the degrees of prohibited relationship unless the custom or usage governing each of them permits of a marriage between the two;

 

(v) the parties are not sapindas of each other, unless the custom or usage governing each of them permits of a marriage between the two;

 

5[***]

 

COMMENTS

 

Burden of Proof

 

The material made available documentary and oral, not supporting that the wife is christian. Held that the marriage is not illegal and void; T. Perumal v. R. Nesammal , AIR 2004 Mad 37.

 

Child Marriage

 

Any marriage solemnized in contravention of clause (iii) of section 5 is neither void nor voidable, the only consequence being that the persons concerned are liable for


the punishment under section 18 and further if the requirements of clause (iv) of sub-section (2) of section 13 as inserted by the marriage laws (Amendment) Act, 1976 are, satisfied, at the instance of the bride, a decree of divorce can be granted; P. Venkataramana v. State , AIR 1977 AP 43.

 

Necessity for a Hindu Marriage

 

(i) A marriage between a Hindu man who converted as Christian and a Christian lady in a Hindu form is not a valid marriage. According to section 5 of the Act marriage can be solemnised between two Hindus; M. Vijayakumari v. K. Devabalan , AIR 2003 Ker 363.

 

(ii) To draw an inference merely from the fact that the spouses had no co-habitation for a short period of about a month, is neither reasonable nor permissible. To brand the wife as unfit for marriage and procreation of children on account of the mental disorder, it needs to be established that the ailment suffered by her is of such a kind or such an extent that it is impossible for her to lead a normal married life; R. Lakshmi Narayan v. Santhi , AIR 2001 SC 2110.

 

Scope

 

If a man and a woman are living under the same roof and cohabiting for a number of years, the law would raise presumption that they lived as husband and wife; S.P.S. Balasubramanyam v. Suruttayan, AIR 1992 SC 756.

 Feel Free to Call

 

 

Nadeem Qureshi (Advocate)

email : nadeemqureshi1@gmail.com

web:    nadeemqureshi498a.webs.com

Mob: +91  9953809956

          +91 8802305262


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register