Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Sreenivas V (S/W)     29 April 2010

False Recovery case

Need some Suggestion or Help on this.

Facing with false 498A since 2yrs now trail is going on which the girl side escaping to come to court (happening in taluk level court)

Instead now they filed another false case on us in district court. the case is saying we have taken away 22 lakhs of gold from them and we have to return it. they say they have given that gold in front of her father, mother, grand father, uncle, two outsiders (who are actually no way related but entered in this dispute just as some paid brokers) and two of our relatives to her daughter and when she came to our home we took away that gold and now we need to return it.

My concern is how far this case is valid. mostly their relatives will say they have given. but two of our relatives will tell the truth whom they mentioned. There is no other proof they mentioned. Same they mentioned in 498A also but some of the items they mentioned here is different than they mentioned in this new case.

Assume if they defeted in 498A then will that be a helpful for us in contesting this case.

Also if out of 8 names they mentioned above if 6 tells their side then we have to give that much amount to them. How far it is valid. Are thee any other points here that will help us. we cannot ask them for income tax return as they are claiming they are very rich and land lords.



Learning

 1 Replies

Adv. Gulammayudin A. Gagdani (LEGAL ADVISOR)     29 April 2010

well have you got any list of items on day of marriage. if not they have specified already all the imtes in 498a and new case are different one's is it ok. if yes then this point can help. remaining things will be useful as video shooting if it contains the things received. rest can be taken over by your advocate in cross examination.

Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register