Breach of employment contract - not fulfililng notice period
Rompalli V.B. Swamy
(Querist) 11 June 2018
This query is : Resolved
Hi,
We have a department manager who supposed to give 2 months notice but sent us email resignation one month ago for which we have recently responded asking to serve 2 M notice period as per appointment letter. But he is absconding saying that he asked for one month notice and him self taken it grated and joined some where. what all things can be done by employer ? what are employer rights ? his gratuity and EL s are due. without clearing no dues, and proper handover he has absconded and joined somewhere. please suggest.
Ms.Usha Kapoor
(Expert) 12 June 2018
You file a case in civil court and raise all your above contentions and he Will attend to court IN RESPONSE TO COURT summons if not NBW WILL BE ISSUED TO ARREST HIM AND BRING BEFORE COURT..CONTACT A SERVICE LAW EXPERT.
Guest
(Expert) 12 June 2018
'Suggest' what for, please make clear? Also, please clarify in what capacity of your company you have posted the query? If you are HR manager, you are supposed to know, what action is desirable. If not knowing take help from your own legal department. Otherwise, get the terms & conditions of employment of your Manager examined by some local expert to take help in sorting out the problem.
R.Ramachandran
(Expert) 12 June 2018
Ms Usha Kapoor: You are suggesting Consumer Court? How come? Are they eligible to approach the Consumer Court?
Guest
(Expert) 12 June 2018
She may be in some misunderstanding as if employees also fall within the scope of consumer forums to be tried against. But, her expertise definitely gets a question mark.
Guest
(Expert) 13 June 2018
I differ with the view of Ms. Usha Kapoor, as she has not stated, how an employer can approach a consumer forum against his employee, even by sticking to his view repeatedly 5 times..
She must state, under which section of the Consumer Protection Act the services of an employee falls to be tried.
Guest
(Expert) 13 June 2018
I differ with the view of Ms. Usha Kapoor, as she has not stated, how an employer can approach a consumer forum against his employee, even by sticking to his view repeatedly 5 times..
She must state, under which section of the Consumer Protection Act the services of an employee falls to be tried.
Guest
(Expert) 13 June 2018
I differ with the view of Ms. Usha Kapoor, as she has not stated, how an employer can approach a consumer forum against his employee, even by sticking to his view repeatedly 5 times..
She must state, under which section of the Consumer Protection Act the services of an employee falls to be tried.
Guest
(Expert) 13 June 2018
I differ with the view of Ms. Usha Kapoor, as she has not stated, how an employer can approach a consumer forum against his employee, even by sticking to his view repeatedly 5 times..
She must state, under which section of the Consumer Protection Act the services of an employee falls to be tried.
Guest
(Expert) 13 June 2018
I differ with the view of Ms. Usha Kapoor, as she has not stated, how an employer can approach a consumer forum against his employee, even by sticking to his view repeatedly 5 times..
She must state, under which section of the Consumer Protection Act the services of an employee falls to be tried.
Guest
(Expert) 13 June 2018
I differ with the view of Ms. Usha Kapoor, as she has not stated, how an employer can approach a consumer forum against his employee, even by sticking to his view repeatedly 5 times..
She must state, under which section of the Consumer Protection Act the services of an employee falls to be tried.
Guest
(Expert) 13 June 2018
I differ with the view of Ms. Usha Kapoor, as she has not stated, how an employer can approach a consumer forum against his employee, even by sticking to his view repeatedly 5 times..
She must state, under which section of the Consumer Protection Act the services of an employee falls to be tried.
Guest
(Expert) 13 June 2018
I differ with the view of Ms. Usha Kapoor, as she has not stated, how an employer can approach a consumer forum against his employee, even by sticking to his view repeatedly 5 times..
She must state, under which section of the Consumer Protection Act the services of an employee falls to be tried.
Guest
(Expert) 13 June 2018
I differ with the view of Ms. Usha Kapoor, as she has not stated, how an employer can approach a consumer forum against his employee, even by sticking to his view repeatedly 5 times..
She must state, under which section of the Consumer Protection Act the services of an employee falls to be tried.
Guest
(Expert) 13 June 2018
I differ with the view of Ms. Usha Kapoor, as she has not stated, how an employer can approach a consumer forum against his employee, even by sticking to his view repeatedly 5 times..
She must state, under which section of the Consumer Protection Act the services of an employee falls to be tried.
Guest
(Expert) 14 June 2018
Ms. USHA KAPOOR WOULD BETTER HAVE ADMITTED ABOUT HER WRONG ADVICE GIVEN EARLIER, RATHER THAN 5 TIMES STICKING TO HER AMENDED ADVICE, WHEN SHE HAD ALREADY BEEN NOTICED AND PINPOINTED ON HER GIVING A WRONG ADVICE TO APPROACH A CONSUMER FORUM IN LABOR & SERVICE MATTERS.
Guest
(Expert) 14 June 2018
Ms. USHA KAPOOR WOULD BETTER HAVE ADMITTED ABOUT HER WRONG ADVICE GIVEN EARLIER, RATHER THAN 5 TIMES STICKING TO HER AMENDED ADVICE, WHEN SHE HAD ALREADY BEEN NOTICED AND PINPOINTED ON HER GIVING A WRONG ADVICE TO APPROACH A CONSUMER FORUM IN LABOR & SERVICE MATTERS.
Guest
(Expert) 14 June 2018
Ms. USHA KAPOOR WOULD BETTER HAVE ADMITTED ABOUT HER WRONG ADVICE GIVEN EARLIER, RATHER THAN 5 TIMES STICKING TO HER AMENDED ADVICE, WHEN SHE HAD ALREADY BEEN NOTICED AND PINPOINTED ON HER GIVING A WRONG ADVICE TO APPROACH A CONSUMER FORUM IN LABOR & SERVICE MATTERS.
Guest
(Expert) 14 June 2018
Ms. USHA KAPOOR WOULD BETTER HAVE ADMITTED ABOUT HER WRONG ADVICE GIVEN EARLIER, RATHER THAN 5 TIMES STICKING TO HER AMENDED ADVICE, WHEN SHE HAD ALREADY BEEN NOTICED AND PINPOINTED ON HER GIVING A WRONG ADVICE TO APPROACH A CONSUMER FORUM IN LABOR & SERVICE MATTERS.
Guest
(Expert) 14 June 2018
Ms. USHA KAPOOR WOULD BETTER HAVE ADMITTED ABOUT HER WRONG ADVICE GIVEN EARLIER, RATHER THAN 5 TIMES STICKING TO HER AMENDED ADVICE, WHEN SHE HAD ALREADY BEEN NOTICED AND PINPOINTED ON HER GIVING A WRONG ADVICE TO APPROACH A CONSUMER FORUM IN LABOR & SERVICE MATTERS.
